Koenigsegg CCX
Car comparison
Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8vsBugatti Divo 8.0 W16
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBugatti Divo
8.0 W16
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8
- Fastest top speed410 km/h255 mph
- Lightest1,280 kg2,822 lb
- Best power-to-weight806 hp/t601 kW/t1.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption22.0 L/100 km10.7 mpg US12.8 mpg UK
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score96/100
- Best economy score48/100
Bugatti Divo 8.0 W16
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.4 s
- Most powerful1,500 hp1,119 kW
- Highest torque1,600 Nm1,180 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption15.2 L/100 km15.5 mpg US18.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range444 km276 mi
- Best practicality score39/100
Specification comparison
| Model | KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | BugattiDivo8.0 W16 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,032hp770kW | 1,500hp1,119kW |
| Torque | 1,080Nm797lb-ft | 1,600Nm1,180lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,280kg2,822lb | 1,995kg4,398lb |
| Top speed | 410 km/h 255 mph | 380 km/h 236 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 100.5s99% target: 406 km/h / 252 mph Calculated | 37.8s99% target: 376 km/h / 234 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.9s | 2.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 8.8s | 6.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.8s Calculated | 2.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 22L/100 km10.7mpg US12.8mpg UK | 22.5L/100 km10.5mpg US12.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 35.2L/100 km6.7mpg US8.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK | 15.2L/100 km15.5mpg US18.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.5s Calculated | 9.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 806hp/t601kW/t366hp/1000 lb Calculated | 752hp/t561kW/t341hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 844Nm/t565lb-ft/ton Calculated | 802Nm/t537lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 318km198mi Calculated | 444km276mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,800cc293cu in | 7,993cc488cu in |
| Length | 4,293mm169in | 4,641mm183in |
| Width | 1,996mm79in | 2,018mm79in |
| Height | 1,114mm44in | 1,212mm48in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,711mm107in |
| Front track | - | 1,749mm69in |
| Rear track | - | 1,666mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 100mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 120L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 100L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 516g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8: Power / Torque
- Bugatti Divo 8.0 W16: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 7,000 rpm | 5,600 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| BugattiDivo8.0 W16 | 6,700 rpm | 2,000-6,000 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | BugattiDivo8.0 W16 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.8 s | 2.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.9 s | 2.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 8.8 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 25.1 s | 15.2 s |
| Top speed | 410 km/h 255 mph | 380 km/h 236 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.7 s | 1.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.5 s | 4.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.9 s | 6.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.9 s | 7.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.5 s | 9.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 221 km/h 137 mph | 261 km/h 162 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 1,032 hp 770 kW |
| BugattiDivo8.0 W16 | 1,500 hp 1,119 kW |
Bugatti Divo 8.0 W16 has 468 hp more than Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8 and Bugatti Divo 8.0 W16: 468 hp (349 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 1,080 Nm 797 lb-ft |
| BugattiDivo8.0 W16 | 1,600 Nm 1,180 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb |
| BugattiDivo8.0 W16 | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 410 km/h 255 mph |
| BugattiDivo8.0 W16 | 380 km/h 236 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 2.9 s |
| BugattiDivo8.0 W16 | 2.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bugatti Divo 8.0 W16 and Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 22.0 L/100 km 10.7 mpg US 12.8 mpg UK |
| BugattiDivo8.0 W16 | 22.5 L/100 km 10.5 mpg US 12.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8 and Bugatti Divo 8.0 W16: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 806 hp/t 601 kW/t 1.2 kg/hp |
| BugattiDivo8.0 W16 | 752 hp/t 561 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 318 km 198 mi |
| BugattiDivo8.0 W16 | 444 km 276 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 1,032 hp 770 kW | 2.9 s | 410 km/h 255 mph |
| BugattiDivo8.0 W16 | 1,500 hp 1,119 kW | 2.4 s | 380 km/h 236 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BugattiDivo8.0 W16 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 |
| 22.0 L/100 km 10.7 mpg US 12.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| BugattiDivo8.0 W16 |
| 22.5 L/100 km 10.5 mpg US 12.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 22.0 L/100 km 10.7 mpg US 12.8 mpg UK | 2.9 s |
| BugattiDivo8.0 W16 | 22.5 L/100 km 10.5 mpg US 12.6 mpg UK | 2.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 806 hp/t 601 kW/t 1.2 kg/hp | 22.0 L/100 km 10.7 mpg US 12.8 mpg UK |
| BugattiDivo8.0 W16 | 752 hp/t 561 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp | 22.5 L/100 km 10.5 mpg US 12.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | BugattiDivo8.0 W16 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,032 hp 770 kW | 1,500 hp 1,119 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,080 Nm 797 lb-ft | 1,600 Nm 1,180 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.9 s | 2.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 410 km/h 255 mph | 380 km/h 236 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 22.0 L/100 km 10.7 mpg US 12.8 mpg UK | 22.5 L/100 km 10.5 mpg US 12.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 318 km 198 mi | 444 km 276 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 516 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 120 L 4.2 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 806 hp/t 601 kW/t 1.2 kg/hp | 752 hp/t 561 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8 | Bugatti Divo 8.0 W16 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 22 L/100 km10.7 mpg US12.8 mpg UK | 22.5 L/100 km10.5 mpg US12.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 38.50 LC100 km | 39.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 61.96 LC100 mi | 63.37 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 3,300 L872 US gal726 UK gal | 3,375 L892 US gal742 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 5,775 LC/year | 5,906 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8
- Is 715 kg lighter
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 54 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Bugatti Divo 8.0 W16
- Has 468 hp more
- Has 520 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 126 km (78 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























