Koenigsegg Agera
Car comparison
Koenigsegg Agera S 5.0 V8vsKoenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonKoenigsegg CCX
R 4.8 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Koenigsegg Agera S 5.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.9 s
- Fastest top speed420 km/h261 mph
- Highest torque1,100 Nm811 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.7 L/100 km16.0 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range544 km338 mi
- Largest trunk120 L
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score96/100
- Best economy score67/100
- Best practicality score34/100
Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8
- Most powerful1,032 hp770 kW
- Lightest1,280 kg2,822 lb
- Best power-to-weight806 hp/t601 kW/t1.2 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8 | KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,030hp768kW | 1,032hp770kW |
| Torque | 1,100Nm811lb-ft | 1,080Nm797lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,415kg3,120lb | 1,280kg2,822lb |
| Gross weight | 1,650kg3,638lb | - |
| Top speed | 420 km/h 261 mph | 410 km/h 255 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.6s99% target: 416 km/h / 258 mph Calculated | 100.5s99% target: 406 km/h / 252 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.9s | 2.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 7.9s | 8.8s |
| 0-60 mph | 2.8s Calculated | 2.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 22L/100 km10.7mpg US12.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK | 18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.3s Calculated | 10.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 728hp/t543kW/t330hp/1000 lb Calculated | 806hp/t601kW/t366hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 777Nm/t520lb-ft/ton Calculated | 844Nm/t565lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 544km338mi Calculated | 318km198mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,032cc307cu in | 4,800cc293cu in |
| Length | 4,293mm169in | 4,293mm169in |
| Width | 1,996mm79in | 1,996mm79in |
| Height | 1,120mm44in | 1,114mm44in |
| Wheelbase | 2,662mm105in | - |
| Front track | 1,700mm67in | - |
| Rear track | 1,650mm65in | - |
| Ground clearance | 100mm4in | 100mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 120L | 120L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Koenigsegg Agera S 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8 | 7,100 rpm | 4,100 rpm | 8,250 rpm |
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 7,000 rpm | 5,600 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8 | KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.9 s | 2.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 7.9 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 20.2 s | 25.1 s |
| Top speed | 420 km/h 261 mph | 410 km/h 255 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 1.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.6 s | 4.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.7 s | 8.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.3 s | 10.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 233 km/h 145 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8 | 1,030 hp 768 kW |
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 1,032 hp 770 kW |
Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8 has 2 hp more than Koenigsegg Agera S 5.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Koenigsegg Agera S 5.0 V8 and Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8 | 1,100 Nm 811 lb-ft |
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 1,080 Nm 797 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8 | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb |
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8 | 420 km/h 261 mph |
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 410 km/h 255 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8 | 2.9 s |
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 2.9 s |
Although Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8 has more power, Koenigsegg Agera S 5.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8 | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 22.0 L/100 km 10.7 mpg US 12.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Koenigsegg Agera S 5.0 V8 and Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8: 7.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8 | 728 hp/t 543 kW/t 1.4 kg/hp |
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 806 hp/t 601 kW/t 1.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8 | 544 km 338 mi |
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 318 km 198 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8 | 1,030 hp 768 kW | 2.9 s | 420 km/h 261 mph |
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 1,032 hp 770 kW | 2.9 s | 410 km/h 255 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8 |
| 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 |
| 22.0 L/100 km 10.7 mpg US 12.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Koenigsegg Agera S 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8 | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 2.9 s |
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 22.0 L/100 km 10.7 mpg US 12.8 mpg UK | 2.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8 | 728 hp/t 543 kW/t 1.4 kg/hp | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 806 hp/t 601 kW/t 1.2 kg/hp | 22.0 L/100 km 10.7 mpg US 12.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8 | KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,030 hp 768 kW | 1,032 hp 770 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,100 Nm 811 lb-ft | 1,080 Nm 797 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.9 s | 2.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 420 km/h 261 mph | 410 km/h 255 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 22.0 L/100 km 10.7 mpg US 12.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 544 km 338 mi | 318 km 198 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 120 L 4.2 cu ft | 120 L 4.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 728 hp/t 543 kW/t 1.4 kg/hp | 806 hp/t 601 kW/t 1.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Koenigsegg Agera S 5.0 V8 | Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK | 22 L/100 km10.7 mpg US12.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.72 LC100 km | 38.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.40 LC100 mi | 61.96 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,205 L582 US gal485 UK gal | 3,300 L872 US gal726 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,859 LC/year | 5,775 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Koenigsegg Agera S 5.0 V8
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 7.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 226 km (140 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8
- Has 2 hp more
- Is 135 kg lighter
- Has 78 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























