Car comparison

Bugatti Chiron Sport 8.0 W16vsKoenigsegg Agera S 5.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Bugatti Chiron

Sport 8.0 W16

1500 hp7993 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2018-present
VS

Koenigsegg Agera

S 5.0 V8

1030 hp5032 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turbo2013-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Koenigsegg Agera S 5.0 V8

  • Lightest
    1,415 kg
    3,120 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    14.7 L/100 km
    16.0 mpg US
    19.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    12.5 L/100 km
    18.8 mpg US
    22.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    544 km
    338 mi
  • Best overall score
    76/100
  • Best performance score
    96/100
  • Best economy score
    67/100

Bugatti Chiron Sport 8.0 W16

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    420 km/h
    261 mph
  • Most powerful
    1,500 hp
    1,119 kW
  • Highest torque
    1,600 Nm
    1,180 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    752 hp/t
    561 kW/t
    1.3 kg/hp
  • Best practicality score
    39/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBugattiChironSport 8.0 W16KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8
Power
1,500hp1,119kW
1,030hp768kW
Torque
1,600Nm1,180lb-ft
1,100Nm811lb-ft
Curb weight
1,995kg4,398lb
1,415kg3,120lb
Gross weight-
1,650kg3,638lb
Top speed
420 km/h
261 mph
420 km/h
261 mph
To 99% top speed
50.5s99% target: 416 km/h / 258 mph
Calculated
76.6s99% target: 416 km/h / 258 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
2.4s
2.9s
0-200 km/h
6.1s
7.9s
0-60 mph
2.3s
Calculated
2.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
22.5L/100 km10.5mpg US12.6mpg UK
14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
35.2L/100 km6.7mpg US8.0mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
15.2L/100 km15.5mpg US18.6mpg UK
12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
9.3s
Calculated
10.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
752hp/t561kW/t341hp/1000 lb
Calculated
728hp/t543kW/t330hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
802Nm/t537lb-ft/ton
Calculated
777Nm/t520lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
444km276mi
Calculated
544km338mi
Calculated
Displacement
7,993cc488cu in
5,032cc307cu in
Length
4,544mm179in
4,293mm169in
Width
2,038mm80in
1,996mm79in
Height
1,212mm48in
1,120mm44in
Wheelbase
2,711mm107in
2,662mm105in
Front track
1,749mm69in
1,700mm67in
Rear track
1,661mm65in
1,650mm65in
Ground clearance-
100mm4in
Trunk volume-
120L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
100L
80L
CO2 emissions
516g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Bugatti Chiron Sport 8.0 W16Koenigsegg Agera S 5.0 V8PowerTorque
  • Bugatti Chiron Sport 8.0 W16: Power / Torque
  • Koenigsegg Agera S 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BugattiChironSport 8.0 W166,700 rpm2,000-6,000 rpm6,950 rpm
KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V87,100 rpm4,100 rpm8,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBugattiChironSport 8.0 W16KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
2.3 s
2.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
2.4 s
2.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
6.1 s
7.9 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
14.6 s
20.2 s
Top speed
420 km/h
261 mph
420 km/h
261 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.7 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
4.2 s
4.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
6.2 s
6.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
7.9 s
8.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
9.3 s
10.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
259 km/h
161 mph
233 km/h
145 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16
1,500 hp
1,119 kW
KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8
1,030 hp
768 kW

Bugatti Chiron Sport 8.0 W16 has 470 hp more than Koenigsegg Agera S 5.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Koenigsegg Agera S 5.0 V8 and Bugatti Chiron Sport 8.0 W16: 470 hp (350 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16
1,600 Nm
1,180 lb-ft
KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8
1,100 Nm
811 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16
1,995 kg
4,398 lb
KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8
1,415 kg
3,120 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16
420 km/h
261 mph
KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8
420 km/h
261 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BugattiChironSport 8.0 W162.4 s
KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V82.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bugatti Chiron Sport 8.0 W16 and Koenigsegg Agera S 5.0 V8: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16
22.5 L/100 km
10.5 mpg US
12.6 mpg UK
KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Koenigsegg Agera S 5.0 V8 and Bugatti Chiron Sport 8.0 W16: 7.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16
752 hp/t
561 kW/t
1.3 kg/hp
KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8
728 hp/t
543 kW/t
1.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16
444 km
276 mi
KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8
544 km
338 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16
1,500 hp
1,119 kW
2.4 s
420 km/h
261 mph
KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8
1,030 hp
768 kW
2.9 s
420 km/h
261 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16
Power
1,500 hp
1,119 kW
0-100 km/h2.4 s
Top speed
420 km/h
261 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,544 mm
178.9 in
Height
1,212 mm
47.7 in
KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8
Power
1,030 hp
768 kW
0-100 km/h2.9 s
Top speed
420 km/h
261 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
120 L
4.2 cu ft
Length
4,293 mm
169.0 in
Height
1,120 mm
44.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16
Power
1,500 hp
1,119 kW
0-100 km/h2.4 s
Top speed
420 km/h
261 mph
22.5 L/100 km
10.5 mpg US
12.6 mpg UK
KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8
Power
1,030 hp
768 kW
0-100 km/h2.9 s
Top speed
420 km/h
261 mph
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK

Koenigsegg Agera S 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16
22.5 L/100 km
10.5 mpg US
12.6 mpg UK
2.4 s
KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
2.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16
752 hp/t
561 kW/t
1.3 kg/hp
22.5 L/100 km
10.5 mpg US
12.6 mpg UK
KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8
728 hp/t
543 kW/t
1.4 kg/hp
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBugattiChironSport 8.0 W16KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8
Power
1,500 hp
1,119 kW
1,030 hp
768 kW
Torque
1,600 Nm
1,180 lb-ft
1,100 Nm
811 lb-ft
Acceleration
2.4 s
2.9 s
Top speed
420 km/h
261 mph
420 km/h
261 mph
Lightness
1,995 kg
4,398 lb
1,415 kg
3,120 lb
Fuel consumption
22.5 L/100 km
10.5 mpg US
12.6 mpg UK
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,544 mm
178.9 in
Height
1,212 mm
47.7 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
120 L
4.2 cu ft
Length
4,293 mm
169.0 in
Height
1,120 mm
44.1 in
Range score
444 km
276 mi
544 km
338 mi
CO2 score
516 g/km
-
Trunk score
-
120 L
4.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
752 hp/t
561 kW/t
1.3 kg/hp
728 hp/t
543 kW/t
1.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBugatti Chiron Sport 8.0 W16Koenigsegg Agera S 5.0 V8
Consumption22.5 L/100 km10.5 mpg US12.6 mpg UK14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km39.38 LC100 km25.72 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi63.37 LC100 mi41.40 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used3,375 L892 US gal742 UK gal2,205 L582 US gal485 UK gal
Annual fuel cost5,906 LC/year3,859 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Bugatti Chiron Sport 8.0 W16

  • Has 470 hp more
  • Has 500 Nm more
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Koenigsegg Agera S 5.0 V8

  • Is 580 kg lighter
  • Uses 7.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 100 km (62 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Bugatti Chiron Sport 8.0 W16
Koenigsegg Agera S 5.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Sport 8.0 W16
8.0 W16
VS
BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16vsBugattiDivo8.0 W16
S 5.0 V8
R 4.8 V8
VS
KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8vsKoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
Sport 8.0 W16
8.0 W16
VS
BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16vsBugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
S 5.0 V8
5.0 V8
VS
KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8vsKoenigseggOne:15.0 V8
Sport 8.0 W16
90 kWh
VS
BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16vsRimacConcept One90 kWh
S 5.0 V8
4.7 i V8 32V
VS
KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8vsKoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V
Sport 8.0 W16
120 kWh
VS
BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16vsRimacNevera120 kWh
S 5.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8vsMcLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
S 5.0 V8
8.0 W16
VS
KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8vsBugattiChiron8.0 W16
Sport 8.0 W16
4.0 V8
VS
BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16vsMcLarenSenna4.0 V8
S 5.0 V8
6.3 V12
VS
KoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8vsFerrariLaFerrari6.3 V12
Sport 8.0 W16
8.3 V16
VS
BugattiChironSport 8.0 W16vsBugattiTourbillon8.3 V16
Bugatti Chiron Sport 8.0 W16 vs Koenigsegg Agera S 5.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster