Koenigsegg Agera
Car comparison
Koenigsegg Agera R 5.0 V8vsBugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBugatti Centodieci
8.0 W16
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Koenigsegg Agera R 5.0 V8
- Fastest top speed420 km/h261 mph
- Lightest1,435 kg3,164 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.7 L/100 km16.0 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range544 km338 mi
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score95/100
- Best economy score67/100
Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.4 s
- Most powerful1,600 hp1,193 kW
- Highest torque1,600 Nm1,180 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight802 hp/t598 kW/t1.2 kg/hp
- Best practicality score39/100
Specification comparison
| Model | KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8 | BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,140hp850kW | 1,600hp1,193kW |
| Torque | 1,200Nm885lb-ft | 1,600Nm1,180lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,435kg3,164lb | 1,995kg4,398lb |
| Gross weight | 1,650kg3,638lb | - |
| Top speed | 420 km/h 261 mph | Unrestricted 395 km/h245 mph Restricted 380 km/h236 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 79.5s99% target: 416 km/h / 258 mph Calculated | 44.2s99% target: 391 km/h / 243 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.8s | 2.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 7.8s | 6.1s |
| 0-60 mph | 2.7s Calculated | 2.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 21.5L/100 km10.9mpg US13.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 10.2s Calculated | 9.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 794hp/t592kW/t360hp/1000 lb Calculated | 802hp/t598kW/t364hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 836Nm/t560lb-ft/ton Calculated | 802Nm/t537lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 544km338mi Calculated | 465km289mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,032cc307cu in | 7,993cc488cu in |
| Length | 4,293mm169in | 4,665mm184in |
| Width | 1,996mm79in | 2,020mm80in |
| Height | 1,120mm44in | 1,215mm48in |
| Wheelbase | 2,662mm105in | 2,711mm107in |
| Front track | 1,700mm67in | 1,749mm69in |
| Rear track | 1,650mm65in | 1,666mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 100mm4in | 125mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 120L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 100L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Koenigsegg Agera R 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8 | 7,100 rpm | 4,100 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | 7,050-7,100 rpm | 2,250-7,000 rpm | 7,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8 | BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.7 s | 2.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.8 s | 2.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 7.8 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 20.3 s | 15.3 s |
| Top speed | 420 km/h 261 mph | Unrestricted 395 km/h245 mph Restricted 380 km/h236 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.7 s | 1.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.5 s | 4.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.7 s | 6.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.6 s | 7.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.2 s | 9.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 233 km/h 145 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8 | 1,140 hp 850 kW |
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | 1,600 hp 1,193 kW |
Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16 has 460 hp more than Koenigsegg Agera R 5.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Koenigsegg Agera R 5.0 V8 and Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16: 460 hp (343 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8 | 1,200 Nm 885 lb-ft |
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | 1,600 Nm 1,180 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8 | 1,435 kg 3,164 lb |
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8 | 420 km/h 261 mph |
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | Unrestricted 395 km/h245 mph Restricted 380 km/h236 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8 | 2.8 s |
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | 2.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16 and Koenigsegg Agera R 5.0 V8: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8 | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | 21.5 L/100 km 10.9 mpg US 13.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Koenigsegg Agera R 5.0 V8 and Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16: 6.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8 | 794 hp/t 592 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp |
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | 802 hp/t 598 kW/t 1.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8 | 544 km 338 mi |
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | 465 km 289 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8 | 1,140 hp 850 kW | 2.8 s | 420 km/h 261 mph |
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | 1,600 hp 1,193 kW | 2.4 s | Unrestricted 395 km/h245 mph Restricted 380 km/h236 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8 |
| 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 |
| 21.5 L/100 km 10.9 mpg US 13.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Koenigsegg Agera R 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8 | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 2.8 s |
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | 21.5 L/100 km 10.9 mpg US 13.1 mpg UK | 2.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8 | 794 hp/t 592 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
| BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | 802 hp/t 598 kW/t 1.2 kg/hp | 21.5 L/100 km 10.9 mpg US 13.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8 | BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,140 hp 850 kW | 1,600 hp 1,193 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,200 Nm 885 lb-ft | 1,600 Nm 1,180 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.8 s | 2.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 420 km/h 261 mph | Unrestricted 395 km/h245 mph Restricted 380 km/h236 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,435 kg 3,164 lb | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 21.5 L/100 km 10.9 mpg US 13.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 544 km 338 mi | 465 km 289 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 120 L 4.2 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 794 hp/t 592 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp | 802 hp/t 598 kW/t 1.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Koenigsegg Agera R 5.0 V8 | Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK | 21.5 L/100 km10.9 mpg US13.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.72 LC100 km | 37.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.40 LC100 mi | 60.55 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,205 L582 US gal485 UK gal | 3,225 L852 US gal709 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,859 LC/year | 5,644 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Koenigsegg Agera R 5.0 V8
- Is 560 kg lighter
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 6.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 79 km (49 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16
- Has 460 hp more
- Has 400 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























