Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250vsBMW Z4 (G29) 20i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW Z4 (G29)
20i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW Z4 (G29) 20i
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range867 km539 mi
- Largest trunk281 L
- Best overall score48/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed244 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Lightest1,400 kg3,086 lb
- Best power-to-weight146 hp/t109 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Best performance score55/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | BMWZ4 (G29)20i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 197hp147kW |
| Torque | 310Nm229lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,400kg3,086lb | 1,430kg3,153lb |
| Gross weight | 1,790kg3,946lb | 1,740kg3,836lb |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.7s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated | 77.9s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.4s Calculated | 26.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 822km511mi Calculated | 867km539mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,796cc110cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,134mm163in | 4,324mm170in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,864mm73in |
| Height | 1,301mm51in | 1,304mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,430mm96in | 2,470mm97in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,609mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | 1,616mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 117mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 225L | 281L |
| Max trunk volume | 335L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 52L |
| CO2 emissions | 169g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250: Power / Torque
- BMW Z4 (G29) 20i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,300 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 4,500-6,500 rpm | 1,450-4,200 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | BMWZ4 (G29)20i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.4 s | 26.3 s |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 204 hp 152 kW |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 197 hp 147 kW |
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 has 7 hp more than BMW Z4 (G29) 20i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z4 (G29) 20i and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 6.5 s |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 and BMW Z4 (G29) 20i: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW Z4 (G29) 20i and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 822 km 511 mi |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 867 km 539 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 204 hp 152 kW | 6.5 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 197 hp 147 kW | 6.6 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW Z4 (G29) 20i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | BMWZ4 (G29)20i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 197 hp 147 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 822 km 511 mi | 867 km 539 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 169 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | 281 L 9.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 | BMW Z4 (G29) 20i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250
- Has 7 hp more
- Is 30 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
BMW Z4 (G29) 20i
- Has 10 Nm more
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 45 km (28 mi) more estimated range
- Has 56 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























