BMW Z4 (E89)
Car comparison
BMW Z4 (E89) 30ivsPorsche Boxster (986) S 3.2
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Boxster (986)
S 3.2
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW Z4 (E89) 30i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque315 Nm232 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.4 L/100 km19.0 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range647 km402 mi
- Best performance score61/100
- Best economy score84/100
Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Lightest1,360 kg2,998 lb
- Best power-to-weight191 hp/t143 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk260 L
- Best overall score51/100
- Best practicality score31/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWZ4 (E89)30i | PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258hp192kW | 260hp194kW |
| Torque | 315Nm232lb-ft | 310Nm229lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,490kg3,285lb | 1,360kg2,998lb |
| Gross weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | 1,670kg3,682lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 79.6s99% target: 255 km/h / 159 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.5s Calculated | 22.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 173hp/t129kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated | 191hp/t143kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated | 228Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 647km402mi Calculated | 577km358mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | 3,179cc194cu in |
| Length | 4,239mm167in | 4,320mm170in |
| Width | 1,790mm70in | 1,780mm70in |
| Height | 1,291mm51in | 1,290mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,496mm98in | 2,415mm95in |
| Front track | 1,511mm59in | 1,455mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,537mm61in | 1,514mm60in |
| Ground clearance | - | 121mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 180L | 260L |
| Max trunk volume | 310L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 64L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW Z4 (E89) 30i: Power / Torque
- Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 6,600 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 6,200 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWZ4 (E89)30i | PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.5 s | 22.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 105 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 258 hp 192 kW |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 260 hp 194 kW |
Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2 has 2 hp more than BMW Z4 (E89) 30i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 30i and Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 315 Nm 232 lb-ft |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 258 km/h 160 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 5.8 s |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 6.4 s |
Although Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2 has more power, BMW Z4 (E89) 30i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 30i and Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 30i and Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 191 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 647 km 402 mi |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 577 km 358 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 258 hp 192 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 260 hp 194 kW | 6.4 s | 258 km/h 160 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW Z4 (E89) 30i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)30i | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 191 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWZ4 (E89)30i | PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp 192 kW | 260 hp 194 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 315 Nm 232 lb-ft | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 647 km 402 mi | 577 km 358 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 180 L 6.4 cu ft | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 191 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW Z4 (E89) 30i | Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.88 LC100 km | 19.43 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,231 LC/year | 2,914 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW Z4 (E89) 30i
- Has 5 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 70 km (44 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2
- Has 2 hp more
- Is 130 kg lighter
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























