Porsche Boxster (987) · Facelift 2009
Car comparison
Porsche Boxster (987) · Facelift 2009 2.9vsBMW Z4 (E89) 28i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW Z4 (E89)
28i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW Z4 (E89) 28i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions159 g/km
- Best estimated range809 km503 mi
- Best overall score52/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9
- Fastest top speed263 km/h163 mph
- Most powerful255 hp190 kW
- Lightest1,335 kg2,943 lb
- Best power-to-weight191 hp/t142 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
- Best performance score62/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | BMWZ4 (E89)28i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 255hp190kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 290Nm214lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,335kg2,943lb | 1,495kg3,296lb |
| Gross weight | 1,635kg3,605lb | 1,750kg3,858lb |
| Top speed | 263 km/h 163 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 92.4s99% target: 260 km/h / 162 mph Calculated | 73.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.3s | 19.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 191hp/t142kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated | 164hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 691km430mi Calculated | 809km503mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,893cc177cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,342mm171in | 4,239mm167in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,790mm70in |
| Height | 1,292mm51in | 1,291mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,415mm95in | 2,496mm98in |
| Front track | 1,490mm59in | 1,511mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,534mm60in | 1,559mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 130L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 221g/km | 159g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9: Power / Torque
- BMW Z4 (E89) 28i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 7,200 rpm | 4,400-6,000 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,250-4,800 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | BMWZ4 (E89)28i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.3 s | 19.6 s |
| Top speed | 263 km/h 163 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 171 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 255 hp 190 kW |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 245 hp 183 kW |
Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9 has 10 hp more than BMW Z4 (E89) 28i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 28i and Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 290 Nm 214 lb-ft |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 263 km/h 163 mph |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 5.9 s |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 5.5 s |
Although Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9 has more power, BMW Z4 (E89) 28i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 28i and Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 28i and Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 691 km 430 mi |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 809 km 503 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 255 hp 190 kW | 5.9 s | 263 km/h 163 mph |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 245 hp 183 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW Z4 (E89) 28i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | BMWZ4 (E89)28i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 255 hp 190 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 290 Nm 214 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 263 km/h 163 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 691 km 430 mi | 809 km 503 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 221 g/km | 159 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 130 L 4.6 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9 | BMW Z4 (E89) 28i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 160 kg lighter
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW Z4 (E89) 28i
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 117 km (73 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 62 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























