Porsche Boxster (981)
Car comparison
Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7vsBMW Z4 (E89) 28i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW Z4 (E89)
28i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW Z4 (E89) 28i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions159 g/km
- Best estimated range809 km503 mi
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7
- Fastest top speed264 km/h164 mph
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Lightest1,330 kg2,932 lb
- Best power-to-weight199 hp/t149 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
- Best overall score52/100
- Best performance score62/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | BMWZ4 (E89)28i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,330kg2,932lb | 1,495kg3,296lb |
| Gross weight | 1,645kg3,627lb | 1,750kg3,858lb |
| Top speed | 264 km/h 164 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 72.0s99% target: 261 km/h / 162 mph Calculated | 73.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.5s Calculated | 19.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 199hp/t149kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated | 164hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 762km473mi Calculated | 809km503mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,706cc165cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,374mm172in | 4,239mm167in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,790mm70in |
| Height | 1,282mm50in | 1,291mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,475mm97in | 2,496mm98in |
| Front track | - | 1,511mm59in |
| Rear track | - | 1,559mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 280L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 195g/km | 159g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7: Power / Torque
- BMW Z4 (E89) 28i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 6,700 rpm | 4,500-6,500 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,250-4,800 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | BMWZ4 (E89)28i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.5 s | 19.6 s |
| Top speed | 264 km/h 164 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 171 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 265 hp 198 kW |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 245 hp 183 kW |
Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7 has 20 hp more than BMW Z4 (E89) 28i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 28i and Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 1,330 kg 2,932 lb |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 264 km/h 164 mph |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 5.8 s |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 5.5 s |
Although Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7 has more power, BMW Z4 (E89) 28i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 28i and Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 28i and Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 762 km 473 mi |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 809 km 503 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 265 hp 198 kW | 5.8 s | 264 km/h 164 mph |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 245 hp 183 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW Z4 (E89) 28i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | BMWZ4 (E89)28i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 264 km/h 164 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,330 kg 2,932 lb | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 762 km 473 mi | 809 km 503 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 195 g/km | 159 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 280 L 9.9 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7 | BMW Z4 (E89) 28i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7
- Has 20 hp more
- Is 165 kg lighter
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW Z4 (E89) 28i
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 47 km (29 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 36 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























