Porsche Boxster (981)
Car comparison
Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7vsAUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TT Roadster (8S)
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions144 g/km
- Best estimated range806 km501 mi
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed264 km/h164 mph
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Best power-to-weight199 hp/t149 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk280 L
- Best overall score52/100
- Best performance score62/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 230hp172kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,330kg2,932lb | 1,320kg2,910lb |
| Gross weight | 1,645kg3,627lb | 1,640kg3,616lb |
| Top speed | 264 km/h 164 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 72.0s99% target: 261 km/h / 162 mph Calculated | 81.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.5s Calculated | 22.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 199hp/t149kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated | 174hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated | 280Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 762km473mi Calculated | 806km501mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,706cc165cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,374mm172in | 4,177mm164in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,282mm50in | 1,355mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,475mm97in | 2,505mm99in |
| Front track | - | 1,572mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,552mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 280L | 280L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 195g/km | 144g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7: Power / Torque
- AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 6,700 rpm | 4,500-6,500 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,600-4,300 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.5 s | 22.0 s |
| Top speed | 264 km/h 164 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 165 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 265 hp 198 kW |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 230 hp 172 kW |
Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7 has 35 hp more than AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI and Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7: 35 hp (26 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 1,330 kg 2,932 lb |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 264 km/h 164 mph |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 5.8 s |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 6.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7 and AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI and Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 762 km 473 mi |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 806 km 501 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 265 hp 198 kW | 5.8 s | 264 km/h 164 mph |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 230 hp 172 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 230 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 264 km/h 164 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,330 kg 2,932 lb | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 762 km 473 mi | 806 km 501 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 195 g/km | 144 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 280 L 9.9 cu ft | 280 L 9.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7 | AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7
- Has 35 hp more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 90 Nm more
- Is 10 kg lighter
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 45 km (28 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 51 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























