BMW Z4 (E89)
Car comparison
BMW Z4 (E89) 28ivsMercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz SLK (R172)
SLK 250
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW Z4 (E89) 28i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight164 hp/t122 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best overall score52/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250
- Lightest1,425 kg3,142 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range909 km565 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWZ4 (E89)28i | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 310Nm229lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 1,425kg3,142lb |
| Gross weight | 1,750kg3,858lb | 1,815kg4,001lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 80.9s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.6s Calculated | 26.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 164hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 809km503mi Calculated | 909km565mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,796cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,239mm167in | 4,134mm163in |
| Width | 1,790mm70in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,291mm51in | 1,303mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,496mm98in | 2,430mm96in |
| Front track | 1,511mm59in | 1,551mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,559mm61in | 1,568mm62in |
| Trunk volume | - | 225L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 335L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 159g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW Z4 (E89) 28i: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,250-4,800 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,300 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWZ4 (E89)28i | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.6 s | 26.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 245 hp 183 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 204 hp 152 kW |
BMW Z4 (E89) 28i has 41 hp more than Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 and BMW Z4 (E89) 28i: 41 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 243 km/h 151 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 5.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 28i and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 809 km 503 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 909 km 565 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 245 hp 183 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 204 hp 152 kW | 6.6 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW Z4 (E89) 28i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWZ4 (E89)28i | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 809 km 503 mi | 909 km 565 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 159 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW Z4 (E89) 28i | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW Z4 (E89) 28i
- Has 41 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250
- Is 70 kg lighter
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 100 km (62 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























