BMW Z4 (E89)
Car comparison
BMW Z4 (E89) 28ivsLotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLotus Elise (SERIES 3)
S Cup 1.8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW Z4 (E89) 28i
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions159 g/km
- Best estimated range809 km503 mi
- Best overall score52/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Lightest952 kg2,099 lb
- Best power-to-weight231 hp/t172 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Best performance score63/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWZ4 (E89)28i | LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 952kg2,099lb |
| Gross weight | 1,750kg3,858lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 73.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 47.0s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.6s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 12.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 164hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 231hp/t172kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 263Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 809km503mi Calculated | 533km331mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | - |
| Length | 4,239mm167in | 3,824mm151in |
| Width | 1,790mm70in | 1,719mm68in |
| Height | 1,291mm51in | 1,117mm44in |
| Wheelbase | 2,496mm98in | 2,300mm91in |
| Front track | 1,511mm59in | - |
| Rear track | 1,559mm61in | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 40L |
| CO2 emissions | 159g/km | 175g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW Z4 (E89) 28i: Power / Torque
- Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,250-4,800 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 6,800 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWZ4 (E89)28i | LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.6 s | 16.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 12.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 245 hp 183 kW |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 220 hp 164 kW |
BMW Z4 (E89) 28i has 25 hp more than Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8.
The biggest power difference is between Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8 and BMW Z4 (E89) 28i: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 952 kg 2,099 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 5.5 s |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 4.6 s |
Although BMW Z4 (E89) 28i has more power, Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8 and BMW Z4 (E89) 28i: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 28i and Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 231 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 809 km 503 mi |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 533 km 331 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 245 hp 183 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 220 hp 164 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 231 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWZ4 (E89)28i | LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 952 kg 2,099 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 809 km 503 mi | 533 km 331 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 159 g/km | 175 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 231 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW Z4 (E89) 28i | Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW Z4 (E89) 28i
- Has 25 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 275 km (171 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 16 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8
- Is 543 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 67 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























