BMW Z4 (E89)
Car comparison
BMW Z4 (E89) 28ivsLotus Elise (SERIES 3) Cup 250 1.8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLotus Elise (SERIES 3)
Cup 250 1.8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW Z4 (E89) 28i
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions159 g/km
- Best estimated range809 km503 mi
- Best overall score52/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Cup 250 1.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.3 s
- Most powerful246 hp183 kW
- Lightest931 kg2,053 lb
- Best power-to-weight264 hp/t197 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
- Best performance score65/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWZ4 (E89)28i | LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 246hp183kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 931kg2,053lb |
| Gross weight | 1,750kg3,858lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 43.4s99% target: 246 km/h / 153 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 4.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.6s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 4.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 164hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 264hp/t197kW/t120hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 809km503mi Calculated | 533km331mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,798cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,239mm167in | 3,824mm151in |
| Width | 1,790mm70in | 1,719mm68in |
| Height | 1,291mm51in | 1,117mm44in |
| Wheelbase | 2,496mm98in | 2,300mm91in |
| Front track | 1,511mm59in | 1,457mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,559mm61in | 1,507mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 130mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 112L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 40L |
| CO2 emissions | 159g/km | 175g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW Z4 (E89) 28i: Power / Torque
- Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Cup 250 1.8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,250-4,800 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8 | 7,200 rpm | 3,500-5,000 rpm | 7,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWZ4 (E89)28i | LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 4.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 4.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.6 s | 14.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 10.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 12.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 245 hp 183 kW |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8 | 246 hp 183 kW |
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Cup 250 1.8 has 1 hp more than BMW Z4 (E89) 28i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 28i and Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Cup 250 1.8: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8 | 931 kg 2,053 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8 | 248 km/h 154 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 5.5 s |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8 | 4.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Cup 250 1.8 and BMW Z4 (E89) 28i: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 28i and Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Cup 250 1.8: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8 | 264 hp/t 197 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 809 km 503 mi |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8 | 533 km 331 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 245 hp 183 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8 | 246 hp 183 kW | 4.3 s | 248 km/h 154 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8 |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Cup 250 1.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 4.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8 | 264 hp/t 197 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWZ4 (E89)28i | LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 246 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 4.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 248 km/h 154 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 931 kg 2,053 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 809 km 503 mi | 533 km 331 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 159 g/km | 175 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 112 L 4.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 264 hp/t 197 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW Z4 (E89) 28i | Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Cup 250 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW Z4 (E89) 28i
- Has 100 Nm more
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 275 km (171 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 16 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Cup 250 1.8
- Has 1 hp more
- Is 564 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 100 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























