Porsche Boxster (986)
Car comparison
Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2vsBMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW Z4 (E85)
2.5i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed258 km/h160 mph
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Highest torque310 Nm229 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight191 hp/t143 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk260 L
- Best overall score51/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best practicality score31/100
BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i
- Lightest1,335 kg2,943 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range743 km462 mi
- Best economy score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 310Nm229lb-ft | 245Nm181lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,360kg2,998lb | 1,335kg2,943lb |
| Gross weight | 1,670kg3,682lb | 1,560kg3,439lb |
| Top speed | 258 km/h 160 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.6s99% target: 255 km/h / 159 mph Calculated | 80.5s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.4s Calculated | 29.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 191hp/t143kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated | 144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 228Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 577km358mi Calculated | 743km462mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,179cc194cu in | 2,494cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,320mm170in | 4,091mm161in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | 1,781mm70in |
| Height | 1,290mm51in | 1,299mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,415mm95in | 2,495mm98in |
| Front track | 1,455mm57in | 1,473mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,514mm60in | 1,523mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 121mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 240L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 260L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2: Power / Torque
- BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 6,200 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 6,000 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.4 s | 29.1 s |
| Top speed | 258 km/h 160 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 260 hp 194 kW |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 192 hp 143 kW |
Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2 has 68 hp more than BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i and Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2: 68 hp (51 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 6.4 s |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2 and BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i and Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2: 3.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 191 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 577 km 358 mi |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 743 km 462 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 260 hp 194 kW | 6.4 s | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.0 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 191 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 258 km/h 160 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 577 km 358 mi | 743 km 462 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 240 L 8.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 191 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2 | BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.43 LC100 km | 12.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,914 LC/year | 1,943 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2
- Has 68 hp more
- Has 65 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 23 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
- Has 47 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i
- Is 25 kg lighter
- Uses 3.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 167 km (104 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























