AUDI TT Roadster (8J)
Car comparison
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSIvsBMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW Z4 (E85)
2.5i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lightest1,295 kg2,855 lb
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk250 L
- Best overall score46/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score30/100
BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range743 km462 mi
- Best economy score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 245Nm181lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,295kg2,855lb | 1,335kg2,943lb |
| Gross weight | 1,615kg3,560lb | 1,560kg3,439lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.9s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 80.5s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.6s Calculated | 29.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated | 184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 705km438mi Calculated | 743km462mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,494cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,178mm164in | 4,091mm161in |
| Width | 1,842mm73in | 1,781mm70in |
| Height | 1,358mm53in | 1,299mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,468mm97in | 2,495mm98in |
| Front track | 1,572mm62in | 1,473mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,558mm61in | 1,523mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 250L | 240L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 260L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 186g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 5,100-6,000 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 6,000 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.6 s | 29.1 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 97 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 192 hp 143 kW |
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI has 8 hp more than BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i and AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 1,295 kg 2,855 lb |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 6.7 s |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI and BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 705 km 438 mi |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 743 km 462 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.7 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.0 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,295 kg 2,855 lb | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 705 km 438 mi | 743 km 462 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 186 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | 240 L 8.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI | BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 12.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 1,943 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 35 Nm more
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 38 km (24 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























