BMW Z4 (E85)
Car comparison
BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5ivsMini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Roadster (R59)
Cooper S 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6
- Highest torque260 Nm192 lb-ft
- Lightest1,205 kg2,657 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range758 km471 mi
- Best economy score89/100
BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Largest trunk240 L
- Best overall score45/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best practicality score30/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 245Nm181lb-ft | 260Nm192lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,335kg2,943lb | 1,205kg2,657lb |
| Gross weight | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,495kg3,296lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.5s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 74.8s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.1s Calculated | 33.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated | 216Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 743km462mi Calculated | 758km471mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,494cc152cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,091mm161in | 3,734mm147in |
| Width | 1,781mm70in | 1,683mm66in |
| Height | 1,299mm51in | 1,390mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,495mm98in | 2,467mm97in |
| Front track | 1,473mm58in | 1,453mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,523mm60in | 1,461mm58in |
| Ground clearance | - | 134mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 240L | 240L |
| Max trunk volume | 260L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 153g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i: Power / Torque
- Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 6,000 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,730-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.1 s | 33.9 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 192 hp 143 kW |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW |
BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i has 8 hp more than Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6 and BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 7.0 s |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i and Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6 and BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 743 km 462 mi |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 758 km 471 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.0 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.2 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 743 km 462 mi | 758 km 471 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 153 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 240 L 8.5 cu ft | 240 L 8.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i | Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i
- Has 8 hp more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6
- Has 15 Nm more
- Is 130 kg lighter
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 14 km (9 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























