BMW Z4 Coupe (E86)
Car comparison
BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2vsBMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW Z4 (E85)
2.5i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful343 hp256 kW
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight241 hp/t179 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk245 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score69/100
- Best practicality score35/100
BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i
- Lightest1,335 kg2,943 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range743 km462 mi
- Best economy score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 343hp256kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 245Nm181lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,425kg3,142lb | 1,335kg2,943lb |
| Gross weight | 1,730kg3,814lb | 1,560kg3,439lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 62.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 80.5s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.7s Calculated | 29.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 241hp/t179kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated | 144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 256Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated | 184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 455km282mi Calculated | 743km462mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,246cc198cu in | 2,494cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,113mm162in | 4,091mm161in |
| Width | 1,781mm70in | 1,781mm70in |
| Height | 1,271mm50in | 1,299mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,497mm98in | 2,495mm98in |
| Front track | 1,486mm59in | 1,473mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,516mm60in | 1,523mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 245L | 240L |
| Max trunk volume | 300L | 260L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2: Power / Torque
- BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 7,900 rpm | 4,900 rpm | 8,150 rpm |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 6,000 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.7 s | 29.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 111 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 343 hp 256 kW |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 192 hp 143 kW |
BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2 has 151 hp more than BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i and BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2: 151 hp (113 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 5.0 s |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2 and BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i: 2.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i and BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2: 4.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 241 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 455 km 282 mi |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 743 km 462 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 343 hp 256 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.0 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 |
| 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 241 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | BMWZ4 (E85)2.5i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 343 hp 256 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 455 km 282 mi | 743 km 462 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 245 L 8.7 cu ft | 240 L 8.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 241 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2 | BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.18 LC100 km | 12.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,176 LC/year | 1,943 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2
- Has 151 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Is 2.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 97 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
BMW Z4 (E85) 2.5i
- Is 90 kg lighter
- Uses 4.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 289 km (179 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























