Porsche Cayman (987C)
Car comparison
Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4vsBMW Z4 Coupe (E86) 3.0 si
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW Z4 Coupe (E86)
3.0 si
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph Unrestricted275 km/h171 mph Restricted
- Most powerful295 hp220 kW
- Highest torque340 Nm251 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight219 hp/t163 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score68/100
- Best economy score78/100
BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) 3.0 si
- Lightest1,325 kg2,921 lb
- Lowest city consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Largest trunk285 L
- Best practicality score37/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)3.0 si |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 295hp220kW | 265hp198kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 315Nm232lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,350kg2,976lb | 1,325kg2,921lb |
| Gross weight | 1,630kg3,594lb | 1,650kg3,638lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 92.6s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 74.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s | 5.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.6s | 19.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 5.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.3L/100 km15.4mpg US18.5mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.5s Calculated | 13.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 219hp/t163kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated | 200hp/t149kW/t91hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 252Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 604km375mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,386cc207cu in | 2,996cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,341mm171in | 4,091mm161in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,781mm70in |
| Height | 1,305mm51in | 1,268mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,415mm95in | 2,495mm98in |
| Front track | 1,486mm59in | 1,473mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,528mm60in | 1,523mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 121mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 285L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 340L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 254g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4: Power / Torque
- BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) 3.0 si: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 6,250 rpm | 4,400-6,000 rpm | 7,300 rpm |
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)3.0 si | 6,600 rpm | 2,750 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)3.0 si |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 5.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 5.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.6 s | 19.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 11.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.5 s | 13.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 171 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 295 hp 220 kW |
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)3.0 si | 265 hp 198 kW |
Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4 has 30 hp more than BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) 3.0 si.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) 3.0 si and Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)3.0 si | 315 Nm 232 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb |
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)3.0 si | 1,325 kg 2,921 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)3.0 si | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 5.4 s |
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)3.0 si | 5.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4 and BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) 3.0 si: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)3.0 si | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 295 hp 220 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)3.0 si | 265 hp 198 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)3.0 si |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)3.0 si | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 295 hp 220 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 315 Nm 232 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 5.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb | 1,325 kg 2,921 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 604 km 375 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 254 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 285 L 10.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,783 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 25 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) 3.0 si
- Is 25 kg lighter
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























