BMW Z4 Coupe (E86)
Car comparison
BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) 3.0 sivsMazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMazda RX-8
1.3 Wankel
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) 3.0 si
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Highest torque315 Nm232 lb-ft
- Lightest1,325 kg2,921 lb
- Best power-to-weight200 hp/t149 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Best performance score63/100
Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel
- Largest trunk290 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best economy score76/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)3.0 si | MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 315Nm232lb-ft | 216Nm159lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,325kg2,921lb | 1,345kg2,965lb |
| Gross weight | 1,650kg3,638lb | 1,820kg4,012lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 74.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 84.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.5s Calculated | 22.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK | 15.8L/100 km14.9mpg US17.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 200hp/t149kW/t91hp/1000 lb Calculated | 186hp/t139kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated | 161Nm/t107lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 535km332mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | 1,308cc80cu in |
| Length | 4,091mm161in | 4,325mm170in |
| Width | 1,781mm70in | 1,780mm70in |
| Height | 1,268mm50in | 1,330mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,495mm98in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,473mm58in | 1,490mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,523mm60in | 1,500mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 285L | 290L |
| Max trunk volume | 340L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 4 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 61L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) 3.0 si: Power / Torque
- Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)3.0 si | 6,600 rpm | 2,750 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 8,500 rpm | 7,500 rpm | 8,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)3.0 si | MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.5 s | 22.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)3.0 si | 265 hp 198 kW |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 250 hp 186 kW |
BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) 3.0 si has 15 hp more than Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel.
The biggest power difference is between Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel and BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) 3.0 si: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)3.0 si | 315 Nm 232 lb-ft |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 216 Nm 159 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)3.0 si | 1,325 kg 2,921 lb |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 1,345 kg 2,965 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)3.0 si | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)3.0 si | 5.7 s |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) 3.0 si and Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel: 0.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)3.0 si | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)3.0 si | 265 hp 198 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)3.0 si |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)3.0 si | MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 315 Nm 232 lb-ft | 216 Nm 159 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,325 kg 2,921 lb | 1,345 kg 2,965 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 535 km 332 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 285 L 10.1 cu ft | 290 L 10.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,993 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) 3.0 si
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 99 Nm more
- Is 20 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























