Car comparison

Mazda RX-8 1.3 WankelvsAUDI TT Coupe (8N) · Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda RX-8

1.3 Wankel

250 hp1308 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2003-2009
VS

AUDI TT Coupe (8N) · Facelift 2000

3.2i V6 24V

250 hp3189 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2003-2006

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Lightest
    1,345 kg
    2,965 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    186 hp/t
    139 kW/t
    5.4 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    290 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best practicality score
    53/100

AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V

  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.6 L/100 km
    22.2 mpg US
    26.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    14.9 L/100 km
    15.8 mpg US
    19.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.1 L/100 km
    29.0 mpg US
    34.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    585 km
    363 mi
  • Best economy score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaRX-81.3 WankelAUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
Power
250hp186kW
250hp186kW
Torque
216Nm159lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,345kg2,965lb
1,490kg3,285lb
Gross weight
1,820kg4,012lb
1,875kg4,134lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
250 km/h
155 mph
To 99% top speed
84.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
85.2s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
6.5s
0-200 km/h
22.9s
Calculated
24.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.2s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
15.8L/100 km14.9mpg US17.9mpg UK
14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.5s
Calculated
14.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
186hp/t139kW/t84hp/1000 lb
Calculated
168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
161Nm/t107lb-ft/ton
Calculated
215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
535km332mi
Calculated
585km363mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,308cc80cu in
3,189cc195cu in
Length
4,325mm170in
4,041mm159in
Width
1,780mm70in
1,764mm69in
Height
1,330mm52in
1,346mm53in
Wheelbase
2,700mm106in
2,422mm95in
Front track
1,490mm59in
1,528mm60in
Rear track
1,500mm59in
1,513mm60in
Trunk volume
290L
220L
Max trunk volume-
490L
Doors
4
3
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
61L
62L
CO2 emissions-
254g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda RX-8 1.3 WankelAUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24VPowerTorque
  • Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel: Power / Torque
  • AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel8,500 rpm7,500 rpm8,750 rpm
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V6,300 rpm2,800-3,200 rpm6,550 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaRX-81.3 WankelAUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.2 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
6.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.9 s
24.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
250 km/h
155 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
12.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.5 s
14.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
101 mph
160 km/h
99 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
250 hp
186 kW
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
250 hp
186 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
216 Nm
159 lb-ft
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
1,345 kg
2,965 lb
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
1,490 kg
3,285 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
250 km/h
155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel6.5 s
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V6.5 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V and Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
186 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
168 hp/t
125 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
535 km
332 mi
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
585 km
363 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
250 hp
186 kW
6.5 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
250 hp
186 kW
6.5 s
250 km/h
155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
290 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
4,325 mm
170.3 in
Height
1,330 mm
52.4 in
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
220 L
7.8 cu ft
Length
4,041 mm
159.1 in
Height
1,346 mm
53.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK

AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK
6.5 s
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
6.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
186 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
168 hp/t
125 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaRX-81.3 WankelAUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
Power
250 hp
186 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
216 Nm
159 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
250 km/h
155 mph
Lightness
1,345 kg
2,965 lb
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
Fuel consumption
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
290 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
4,325 mm
170.3 in
Height
1,330 mm
52.4 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
220 L
7.8 cu ft
Length
4,041 mm
159.1 in
Height
1,346 mm
53.0 in
Range score
535 km
332 mi
585 km
363 mi
CO2 score
-
254 g/km
Trunk score
290 L
10.2 cu ft
220 L
7.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
186 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
168 hp/t
125 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda RX-8 1.3 WankelAUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V
Consumption11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.95 LC100 km18.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.11 LC100 mi29.85 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,993 LC/year2,783 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel

  • Is 145 kg lighter
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 70 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V

  • Has 104 Nm more
  • Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 50 km (31 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel
AUDI TT Coupe (8N) 3.2i V6 24V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.3 Wankel
630i
VS
MazdaRX-81.3 WankelvsBMW6 Series (E63)630i
3.2i V6 24V
3.2i V6 24V
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24VvsAUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
1.3 Wankel
1.8 T sport
VS
MazdaRX-81.3 WankelvsAUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T sport
3.2i V6 24V
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24VvsAUDITTS Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI
1.3 Wankel
2.7
VS
MazdaRX-81.3 WankelvsPorscheCayman (987C)2.7
3.2i V6 24V
1.8 T
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24VvsAUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T
3.2i V6 24V
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24VvsAUDITTS Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
1.3 Wankel
3.2 V6
VS
MazdaRX-81.3 WankelvsVolkswagenEos3.2 V6
3.2i V6 24V
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24VvsAUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
1.3 Wankel
3.0 si
VS
MazdaRX-81.3 WankelvsBMWZ4 Coupe (E86)3.0 si
3.2i V6 24V
3.2i V6 24V
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24VvsAUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
1.3 Wankel
3.2 JTS V6
VS
MazdaRX-81.3 WankelvsAlfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel vs AUDI TT Coupe (8N) · Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V - car comparison - FastVsFaster