Porsche Cayenne III
Car comparison
Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8vsBMW X7 (G07) M50i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X7 (G07)
M50i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Fastest top speed286 km/h178 mph
- Most powerful550 hp410 kW
- Highest torque770 Nm568 lb-ft
- Lightest2,175 kg4,795 lb
- Best power-to-weight253 hp/t189 kW/t4.0 kg/hp
- Best estimated range756 km470 mi
- Largest trunk745 L
- Best overall score87/100
- Best performance score85/100
- Best practicality score92/100
BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.2 L/100 km21.0 mpg US25.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.3 L/100 km15.4 mpg US18.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions258 g/km
- Best economy score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 530hp395kW |
| Torque | 770Nm568lb-ft | 750Nm553lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,175kg4,795lb | 2,490kg5,490lb |
| Gross weight | 2,935kg6,471lb | 3,295kg7,264lb |
| Top speed | 286 km/h 178 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 57.1s99% target: 283 km/h / 176 mph Calculated | 66.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 4.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.8s Calculated | 17.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 4.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK | 15.3L/100 km15.4mpg US18.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.0s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 253hp/t189kW/t115hp/1000 lb Calculated | 213hp/t159kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 354Nm/t237lb-ft/ton Calculated | 301Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 756km470mi Calculated | 741km460mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,996cc244cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,926mm194in | 5,151mm203in |
| Width | 1,983mm78in | 2,000mm79in |
| Height | 1,673mm66in | 1,805mm71in |
| Wheelbase | 2,895mm114in | 3,105mm122in |
| Front track | - | 1,682mm66in |
| Rear track | - | 1,703mm67in |
| Ground clearance | - | 221mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 745L | 326L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,680L | 2,120L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 6 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 83L |
| CO2 emissions | 272g/km | 258g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 5,750-6,000 rpm | 1,960-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 5,500-6,000 rpm | 1,800-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 4.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 4.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.8 s | 17.2 s |
| Top speed | 286 km/h 178 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.0 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 194 km/h 121 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 530 hp 395 kW |
Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8 has 20 hp more than BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8 and Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 2,175 kg 4,795 lb |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 2,490 kg 5,490 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 286 km/h 178 mph |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 4.1 s |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 4.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8 and BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8 and Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 253 hp/t 189 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 756 km 470 mi |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 741 km 460 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.1 s | 286 km/h 178 mph |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 530 hp 395 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 |
| 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 |
| 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 253 hp/t 189 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 530 hp 395 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 4.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 286 km/h 178 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,175 kg 4,795 lb | 2,490 kg 5,490 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 756 km 470 mi | 741 km 460 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 272 g/km | 258 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 745 L 26.3 cu ft | 326 L 11.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 253 hp/t 189 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8 | BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.83 LC100 km | 19.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,124 LC/year | 2,940 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 315 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 26 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Has 40 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 15 km (9 mi) more estimated range
- Has 419 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 14 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























