Jaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Jaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020 SVR 5.0i V8vsBMW X7 (G07) M50i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X7 (G07)
M50i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 SVR 5.0i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.0 s
- Fastest top speed286 km/h178 mph
- Most powerful550 hp410 kW
- Lightest2,133 kg4,702 lb
- Best power-to-weight258 hp/t192 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk793 L
- Best overall score87/100
- Best performance score85/100
- Best practicality score92/100
BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.2 L/100 km21.0 mpg US25.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range741 km460 mi
- Best economy score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8 | BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 530hp395kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 750Nm553lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,133kg4,702lb | 2,490kg5,490lb |
| Gross weight | - | 3,295kg7,264lb |
| Top speed | 286 km/h 178 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 57.5s99% target: 283 km/h / 176 mph Calculated | 66.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.0s | 4.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.7s Calculated | 17.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.8s Calculated | 4.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 15.3L/100 km15.4mpg US18.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.9s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 258hp/t192kW/t117hp/1000 lb Calculated | 213hp/t159kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 328Nm/t220lb-ft/ton Calculated | 301Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 672km418mi Calculated | 741km460mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,000cc305cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,762mm187in | 5,151mm203in |
| Width | 2,071mm82in | 2,000mm79in |
| Height | 1,670mm66in | 1,805mm71in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 3,105mm122in |
| Front track | 1,648mm65in | 1,682mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,666mm66in | 1,703mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 213mm8in | 221mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 793L | 326L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,842L | 2,120L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 6 |
| Fuel tank | 82L | 83L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 258g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 SVR 5.0i V8: Power / Torque
- BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8 | 6,250-6,500 rpm | 3,500-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 5,500-6,000 rpm | 1,800-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8 | BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.8 s | 4.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.0 s | 4.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.7 s | 17.2 s |
| Top speed | 286 km/h 178 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.9 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 194 km/h 121 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 530 hp 395 kW |
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 SVR 5.0i V8 has 20 hp more than BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8 and Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 SVR 5.0i V8: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8 | 2,133 kg 4,702 lb |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 2,490 kg 5,490 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8 | 286 km/h 178 mph |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8 | 4.0 s |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 4.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 SVR 5.0i V8 and BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8 and Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 SVR 5.0i V8: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8 | 258 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8 | 672 km 418 mi |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 741 km 460 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.0 s | 286 km/h 178 mph |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 530 hp 395 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8 |
| 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 |
| 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 SVR 5.0i V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8 | 258 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8 | BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 530 hp 395 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.0 s | 4.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 286 km/h 178 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,133 kg 4,702 lb | 2,490 kg 5,490 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 672 km 418 mi | 741 km 460 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 258 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 793 L 28.0 cu ft | 326 L 11.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 258 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 SVR 5.0i V8 | BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.35 LC100 km | 19.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.36 LC100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,830 L483 US gal403 UK gal | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,203 LC/year | 2,940 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 SVR 5.0i V8
- Has 20 hp more
- Is 357 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 26 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Has 45 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 467 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8
- Has 50 Nm more
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 69 km (43 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























