Car comparison

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8vsBMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017

SVR 5.0 V8

575 hp5000 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedSUV2017-2022
VS

BMW X6 M (F86)

4.4 V8

575 hp4395 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.2 s
  • Highest torque
    750 Nm
    553 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,265 kg
    4,993 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    254 hp/t
    189 kW/t
    3.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.1 L/100 km
    21.2 mpg US
    25.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    14.7 L/100 km
    16.0 mpg US
    19.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.0 L/100 km
    26.1 mpg US
    31.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    258 g/km
  • Best economy score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8
Power
575hp429kW
575hp429kW
Torque
700Nm516lb-ft
750Nm553lb-ft
Curb weight
2,310kg5,093lb
2,265kg4,993lb
Gross weight
3,000kg6,614lb
2,950kg6,504lb
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
62.5s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph
Calculated
53.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.5s
4.2s
0-200 km/h
14.3s
Calculated
14.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.3s
Calculated
4.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK
11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK
14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.5s
Calculated
12.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
249hp/t186kW/t113hp/1000 lb
Calculated
254hp/t189kW/t115hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
303Nm/t203lb-ft/ton
Calculated
331Nm/t222lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
813km505mi
Calculated
766km476mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,000cc305cu in
4,395cc268cu in
Length
4,879mm192in
4,909mm193in
Width-
1,989mm78in
Height
1,803mm71in
1,689mm66in
Wheelbase
2,923mm115in
2,933mm115in
Front track
1,693mm67in
1,666mm66in
Rear track
1,686mm66in
1,667mm66in
Ground clearance
278mm11in
195mm8in
Trunk volume
780L
550L
Max trunk volume
1,686L
1,525L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
104L
85L
CO2 emissions
294g/km
258g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8PowerTorque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
  • BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V86,000-6,500 rpm3,500-5,000 rpm6,750 rpm
BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V86,000-6,500 rpm2,200-5,000 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.3 s
4.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.5 s
4.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
14.3 s
14.7 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
5.5 s
5.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.2 s
8.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.6 s
10.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.5 s
12.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
188 km/h
117 mph
186 km/h
115 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
575 hp
429 kW
BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8
575 hp
429 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8
750 Nm
553 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
2,310 kg
5,093 lb
BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8
2,265 kg
4,993 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
283 km/h
176 mph
BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V84.5 s
BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V84.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8: 1.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
249 hp/t
186 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8
254 hp/t
189 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
813 km
505 mi
BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8
766 km
476 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
575 hp
429 kW
4.5 s
283 km/h
176 mph
BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8
575 hp
429 kW
4.2 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
Power
575 hp
429 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
780 L
27.5 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,803 mm
71.0 in
BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8
Power
575 hp
429 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,909 mm
193.3 in
Height
1,689 mm
66.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
Power
575 hp
429 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8
Power
575 hp
429 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
4.5 s
BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
4.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
249 hp/t
186 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8
254 hp/t
189 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8
Power
575 hp
429 kW
575 hp
429 kW
Torque
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
750 Nm
553 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.5 s
4.2 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
2,310 kg
5,093 lb
2,265 kg
4,993 lb
Fuel consumption
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
780 L
27.5 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,803 mm
71.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,909 mm
193.3 in
Height
1,689 mm
66.5 in
Range score
813 km
505 mi
766 km
476 mi
CO2 score
294 g/km
258 g/km
Trunk score
780 L
27.5 cu ft
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
249 hp/t
186 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
254 hp/t
189 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLand Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8
Consumption12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km22.40 LC100 km19.43 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi36.05 LC100 mi31.26 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,920 L507 US gal422 UK gal1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,360 LC/year2,914 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8

  • Has 23 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 47 km (29 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 230 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8

  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Is 45 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 36 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II SVR 5.0 V8
BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

SVR 5.0 V8
Turbo 4.0 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8vsPorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
4.4 V8
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8vsBMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
GTS 3.8 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8vsMaseratiLevanteGTS 3.8 V8
4.4 V8
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8vsBMWX6 M (E71)4.4 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8vsBentleyBentayga4.0 V8
4.4 V8
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8vsBMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
SVR 5.0i V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8
4.4 V8
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8vsBMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8vsBentleyBentaygaFacelift 20204.0 V8
4.4 V8
4.4
VS
BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8vsBMWX5 M (E70)4.4
SVR 5.0 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8
4.4 V8
M50i V8
VS
BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8vsBMWX7 (G07)M50i V8
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8 vs BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster