Car comparison

BMW X6 (F16) 40dvsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X6 (F16)

40d

313 hp2993 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2014-2018
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II

4.4 V8

339 hp4367 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2014-2015

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X6 (F16) 40d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph
  • Lightest
    2,105 kg
    4,641 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    149 hp/t
    111 kW/t
    6.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    165 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,349 km
    838 mi
  • Best overall score
    73/100
  • Best performance score
    66/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX6 (F16)40dLand RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
Power
313hp233kW
339hp253kW
Torque
630Nm465lb-ft
700Nm516lb-ft
Curb weight
2,105kg4,641lb
2,398kg5,287lb
Gross weight
2,820kg6,217lb
-
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
74.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
99.8s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.8s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
24.2s
Calculated
32.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.5s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.0s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
299Nm/t200lb-ft/ton
Calculated
292Nm/t195lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,349km838mi
Calculated
1,221km759mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,993cc183cu in
4,367cc266cu in
Length
4,909mm193in
4,850mm191in
Width
1,989mm78in
1,983mm78in
Height
1,702mm67in
1,780mm70in
Wheelbase
2,933mm115in
2,923mm115in
Front track
1,640mm65in
-
Rear track
1,706mm67in
-
Ground clearance
212mm8in
-
Trunk volume
550L
-
Max trunk volume
1,525L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
85L
105L
CO2 emissions
165g/km
229g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X6 (F16) 40dLand Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8PowerTorque
  • BMW X6 (F16) 40d: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX6 (F16)40d4,400 rpm1,500-2,500 rpm4,650 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8-1,750-3,500 rpm3,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX6 (F16)40dLand RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.5 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.8 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
24.2 s
32.8 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.0 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.1 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
12.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.0 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
162 km/h
101 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
313 hp
233 kW
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
339 hp
253 kW

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8 has 26 hp more than BMW X6 (F16) 40d.

The biggest power difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 40d and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8: 26 hp (19 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
630 Nm
465 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
700 Nm
516 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
2,105 kg
4,641 lb
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
2,398 kg
5,287 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
240 km/h
149 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d5.8 s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V86.9 s

Although Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8 has more power, BMW X6 (F16) 40d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 40d and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8: 1.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 40d and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8: 2.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
1,349 km
838 mi
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
1,221 km
759 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX6 (F16)40d
313 hp
233 kW
5.8 s
240 km/h
149 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
339 hp
253 kW
6.9 s
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX6 (F16)40d
Power
313 hp
233 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,909 mm
193.3 in
Height
1,702 mm
67.0 in
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
Power
339 hp
253 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,850 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX6 (F16)40d
Power
313 hp
233 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
Power
339 hp
253 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

BMW X6 (F16) 40d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX6 (F16)40d
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
5.8 s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX6 (F16)40d
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX6 (F16)40dLand RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8
Power
313 hp
233 kW
339 hp
253 kW
Torque
630 Nm
465 lb-ft
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.8 s
6.9 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Lightness
2,105 kg
4,641 lb
2,398 kg
5,287 lb
Fuel consumption
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,909 mm
193.3 in
Height
1,702 mm
67.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,850 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
Range score
1,349 km
838 mi
1,221 km
759 mi
CO2 score
165 g/km
229 g/km
Trunk score
550 L
19.4 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X6 (F16) 40dLand Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8
Consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.03 LC100 km15.05 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.74 LC100 mi24.22 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used945 L250 US gal208 UK gal1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,654 LC/year2,258 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X6 (F16) 40d

  • Is 293 kg lighter
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 128 km (80 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 64 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8

  • Has 26 hp more
  • Has 70 Nm more

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X6 (F16) 40d
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

40d
35i
VS
BMWX6 (F16)40dvsBMWX6 (E71)35i
4.4 V8
GL 400
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8vsMercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400
40d
40i
VS
BMWX6 (F16)40dvsBMWX6 (G06)40i
4.4 V8
3.0 V6 TSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8vsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI
40d
40d
VS
BMWX6 (F16)40dvsBMWX6 (G06 LCI)Facelift 202340d
4.4 V8
2.0 T6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
40d
35d
VS
BMWX6 (F16)40dvsBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d
4.4 V8
GLS 400
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400
40d
35d
VS
BMWX6 (F16)40dvsBMWX3 (F25)35d
4.4 V8
4.2 TDI V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8vsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 TDI V8
40d
40i
VS
BMWX6 (F16)40dvsBMWX7 (G07)40i
4.4 V8
3.0 V6 GDI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II4.4 V8vsMaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI
BMW X6 (F16) 40d vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster