Car comparison

BMW X6 (F16) 40dvsJeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2013 5.7 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X6 (F16)

40d

313 hp2993 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2014-2018
VS

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2013

5.7 V8

352 hp5654 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2013-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X6 (F16) 40d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph
  • Highest torque
    630 Nm
    465 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,105 kg
    4,641 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    149 hp/t
    111 kW/t
    6.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    165 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,349 km
    838 mi
  • Largest trunk
    550 L
  • Best overall score
    73/100
  • Best performance score
    66/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX6 (F16)40dJeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8
Power
313hp233kW
352hp262kW
Torque
630Nm465lb-ft
520Nm384lb-ft
Curb weight
2,105kg4,641lb
2,499kg5,509lb
Gross weight
2,820kg6,217lb
2,949kg6,501lb
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
74.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
108.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.8s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
24.2s
Calculated
35.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.5s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
19.6L/100 km12mpg US14.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.0s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
299Nm/t200lb-ft/ton
Calculated
208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,349km838mi
Calculated
715km445mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,993cc183cu in
5,654cc345cu in
Length
4,909mm193in
4,828mm190in
Width
1,989mm78in
1,943mm76in
Height
1,702mm67in
1,802mm71in
Wheelbase
2,933mm115in
2,915mm115in
Front track
1,640mm65in
1,628mm64in
Rear track
1,706mm67in
1,634mm64in
Ground clearance
212mm8in
264mm10in
Trunk volume
550L
457L
Max trunk volume
1,525L
1,554L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
85L
93L
CO2 emissions
165g/km
304g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X6 (F16) 40dJeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 5.7 V8PowerTorque
  • BMW X6 (F16) 40d: Power / Torque
  • Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 5.7 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX6 (F16)40d4,400 rpm1,500-2,500 rpm4,650 rpm
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V85,200 rpm4,200 rpm5,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX6 (F16)40dJeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.5 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.8 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
24.2 s
35.2 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.0 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.1 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.0 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
162 km/h
101 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
313 hp
233 kW
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8
352 hp
262 kW

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 5.7 V8 has 39 hp more than BMW X6 (F16) 40d.

The biggest power difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 40d and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 5.7 V8: 39 hp (29 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
630 Nm
465 lb-ft
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8
520 Nm
384 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
2,105 kg
4,641 lb
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8
2,499 kg
5,509 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
240 km/h
149 mph
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 5.7 V8 has more power, BMW X6 (F16) 40d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 40d and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 5.7 V8: 1.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 40d and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 5.7 V8: 6.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
1,349 km
838 mi
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8
715 km
445 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX6 (F16)40d
313 hp
233 kW
5.8 s
240 km/h
149 mph
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8
352 hp
262 kW
7.3 s
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX6 (F16)40d
Power
313 hp
233 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,909 mm
193.3 in
Height
1,702 mm
67.0 in
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8
Power
352 hp
262 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
457 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,828 mm
190.1 in
Height
1,802 mm
70.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX6 (F16)40d
Power
313 hp
233 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8
Power
352 hp
262 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK

BMW X6 (F16) 40d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX6 (F16)40d
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
5.8 s
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX6 (F16)40d
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX6 (F16)40dJeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20135.7 V8
Power
313 hp
233 kW
352 hp
262 kW
Torque
630 Nm
465 lb-ft
520 Nm
384 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.8 s
7.3 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Lightness
2,105 kg
4,641 lb
2,499 kg
5,509 lb
Fuel consumption
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,909 mm
193.3 in
Height
1,702 mm
67.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
457 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,828 mm
190.1 in
Height
1,802 mm
70.9 in
Range score
1,349 km
838 mi
715 km
445 mi
CO2 score
165 g/km
304 g/km
Trunk score
550 L
19.4 cu ft
457 L
16.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X6 (F16) 40dJeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 5.7 V8
Consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK13 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.03 LC100 km22.75 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.74 LC100 mi36.61 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used945 L250 US gal208 UK gal1,950 L515 US gal429 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,654 LC/year3,413 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X6 (F16) 40d

  • Has 110 Nm more
  • Is 394 kg lighter
  • Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 6.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 634 km (394 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 93 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 139 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X6 (F16) 40d
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) 5.7 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

BMW X6 (F16) 40d vs Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2013 5.7 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster