Car comparison

BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8vsLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X5 M (F85)

4.4 V8

575 hp4395 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2015-2018
VS

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    575 hp
    429 kW
  • Highest torque
    750 Nm
    553 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,275 kg
    5,016 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    253 hp/t
    188 kW/t
    4.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.1 L/100 km
    21.2 mpg US
    25.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    14.7 L/100 km
    16.0 mpg US
    19.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.0 L/100 km
    26.1 mpg US
    31.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    258 g/km
  • Best overall score
    85/100
  • Best performance score
    82/100
  • Best economy score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8
Power
575hp429kW
565hp421kW
Torque
750Nm553lb-ft
700Nm516lb-ft
Curb weight
2,275kg5,016lb
2,497kg5,505lb
Gross weight
2,970kg6,548lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
56.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
61.8s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.2s
5.4s
0-200 km/h
15.0s
Calculated
22.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.0s
Calculated
5.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK
12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK
18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.3s
Calculated
13.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
253hp/t188kW/t115hp/1000 lb
Calculated
226hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
330Nm/t221lb-ft/ton
Calculated
280Nm/t188lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
766km476mi
Calculated
809km502mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,395cc268cu in
5,000cc305cu in
Length
4,880mm192in
5,000mm197in
Width
1,985mm78in
-
Height
1,754mm69in
1,869mm74in
Wheelbase
2,933mm115in
2,922mm115in
Front track
1,666mm66in
1,693mm67in
Rear track
1,667mm66in
1,685mm66in
Ground clearance
195mm8in
212mm8in
Trunk volume
650L
900L
Max trunk volume
1,870L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
85L
104L
CO2 emissions
258g/km
294g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.0 s
5.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.2 s
5.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
15.0 s
22.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.3 s
5.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.0 s
8.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.4 s
11.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.3 s
13.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
184 km/h
115 mph
167 km/h
104 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 has 10 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8 and BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
750 Nm
553 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8
700 Nm
516 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
2,275 kg
5,016 lb
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8
2,497 kg
5,505 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8: 1.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8: 1.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
253 hp/t
188 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8
226 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
575 hp
429 kW
4.2 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8
565 hp
421 kW
5.4 s
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
Power
575 hp
429 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,880 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,754 mm
69.1 in
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8
Power
565 hp
421 kW
0-100 km/h5.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
900 L
31.8 cu ft
Length
5,000 mm
196.9 in
Height
1,869 mm
73.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
Power
575 hp
429 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8
Power
565 hp
421 kW
0-100 km/h5.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK

BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
4.2 s
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
5.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
253 hp/t
188 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8
226 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8
Power
575 hp
429 kW
565 hp
421 kW
Torque
750 Nm
553 lb-ft
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.2 s
5.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Lightness
2,275 kg
5,016 lb
2,497 kg
5,505 lb
Fuel consumption
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,880 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,754 mm
69.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
900 L
31.8 cu ft
Length
5,000 mm
196.9 in
Height
1,869 mm
73.6 in
Range score
766 km
476 mi
809 km
502 mi
CO2 score
258 g/km
294 g/km
Trunk score
650 L
23.0 cu ft
900 L
31.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
253 hp/t
188 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
226 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8
Consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.43 LC100 km22.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi31.26 LC100 mi36.05 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal1,920 L507 US gal422 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,914 LC/year3,360 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Is 222 kg lighter
  • Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 36 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8
Land Rover Range Rover IV SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 vs Land Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster