BMW X5 M (F85)
Car comparison
BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8vsLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017
SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful575 hp429 kW
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Lightest2,275 kg5,016 lb
- Best power-to-weight253 hp/t188 kW/t4.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.7 L/100 km16.0 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions258 g/km
- Best overall score85/100
- Best performance score82/100
- Best economy score77/100
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8
- Best estimated range809 km502 mi
- Largest trunk900 L
- Best practicality score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 575hp429kW | 565hp421kW |
| Torque | 750Nm553lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,275kg5,016lb | 2,497kg5,505lb |
| Gross weight | 2,970kg6,548lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 56.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 61.8s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 5.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.0s Calculated | 22.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 253hp/t188kW/t115hp/1000 lb Calculated | 226hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 330Nm/t221lb-ft/ton Calculated | 280Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 766km476mi Calculated | 809km502mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 4,880mm192in | 5,000mm197in |
| Width | 1,985mm78in | - |
| Height | 1,754mm69in | 1,869mm74in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,922mm115in |
| Front track | 1,666mm66in | 1,693mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,667mm66in | 1,685mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 195mm8in | 212mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 650L | 900L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,870L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 104L |
| CO2 emissions | 258g/km | 294g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 5.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.0 s | 22.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 115 mph | 167 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | 575 hp 429 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8 | 565 hp 421 kW |
BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 has 10 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8 and BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | 2,275 kg 5,016 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8 | 2,497 kg 5,505 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | 4.2 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8 | 5.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8 | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | 253 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8 | 226 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | 766 km 476 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8 | 809 km 502 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | 575 hp 429 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8 | 565 hp 421 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8 |
| 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8 | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | 253 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8 | 226 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 575 hp 429 kW | 565 hp 421 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 5.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,275 kg 5,016 lb | 2,497 kg 5,505 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 766 km 476 mi | 809 km 502 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 258 g/km | 294 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | 900 L 31.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 253 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 226 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 | Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK | 12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.43 LC100 km | 22.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi | 36.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal | 1,920 L507 US gal422 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,914 LC/year | 3,360 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 222 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 36 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8
- Has 43 km (27 mi) more estimated range
- Has 250 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























