Car comparison

BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8vsLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 5.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X5 M (F85)

4.4 V8

575 hp4395 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2015-2018
VS

Land Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017

5.0 V8

565 hp5000 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedSUV2018-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    575 hp
    429 kW
  • Highest torque
    750 Nm
    553 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,275 kg
    5,016 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    253 hp/t
    188 kW/t
    4.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.1 L/100 km
    21.2 mpg US
    25.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    258 g/km
  • Best overall score
    85/100
  • Best performance score
    82/100
  • Best economy score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8
Power
575hp429kW
565hp421kW
Torque
750Nm553lb-ft
700Nm516lb-ft
Curb weight
2,275kg5,016lb
2,598kg5,728lb
Gross weight
2,970kg6,548lb
3,200kg7,055lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
56.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
82.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.2s
5.5s
0-200 km/h
15.0s
Calculated
20.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.0s
Calculated
5.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK
13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
12.3s
Calculated
13.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
253hp/t188kW/t115hp/1000 lb
Calculated
217hp/t162kW/t99hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
330Nm/t221lb-ft/ton
Calculated
269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
766km476mi
Calculated
796km495mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,395cc268cu in
5,000cc305cu in
Length
4,880mm192in
5,200mm205in
Width
1,985mm78in
2,073mm82in
Height
1,754mm69in
1,868mm74in
Wheelbase
2,933mm115in
3,120mm123in
Front track
1,666mm66in
1,693mm67in
Rear track
1,667mm66in
1,685mm66in
Ground clearance
195mm8in
297mm12in
Trunk volume
650L
-
Max trunk volume
1,870L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
85L
104L
CO2 emissions
258g/km
298g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8PowerTorque
  • BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V86,000-6,500 rpm2,200-5,000 rpm6,750 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V86,000-6,500 rpm3,500-5,000 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.0 s
5.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.2 s
5.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
15.0 s
20.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.3 s
5.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.0 s
8.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.4 s
11.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.3 s
13.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
184 km/h
115 mph
167 km/h
104 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
575 hp
429 kW
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8
565 hp
421 kW

BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 has 10 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8 and BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
750 Nm
553 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8
700 Nm
516 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
2,275 kg
5,016 lb
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8
2,598 kg
5,728 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V84.2 s
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V85.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8: 1.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8
13.1 L/100 km
18.0 mpg US
21.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8: 2.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
253 hp/t
188 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8
217 hp/t
162 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
766 km
476 mi
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8
796 km
495 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
575 hp
429 kW
4.2 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8
565 hp
421 kW
5.5 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
Power
575 hp
429 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,880 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,754 mm
69.1 in
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8
Power
565 hp
421 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,200 mm
204.7 in
Height
1,868 mm
73.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
Power
575 hp
429 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8
Power
565 hp
421 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
13.1 L/100 km
18.0 mpg US
21.6 mpg UK

BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
4.2 s
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8
13.1 L/100 km
18.0 mpg US
21.6 mpg UK
5.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
253 hp/t
188 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8
217 hp/t
162 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
13.1 L/100 km
18.0 mpg US
21.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8
Power
575 hp
429 kW
565 hp
421 kW
Torque
750 Nm
553 lb-ft
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.2 s
5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
2,275 kg
5,016 lb
2,598 kg
5,728 lb
Fuel consumption
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
13.1 L/100 km
18.0 mpg US
21.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,880 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,754 mm
69.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,200 mm
204.7 in
Height
1,868 mm
73.5 in
Range score
766 km
476 mi
796 km
495 mi
CO2 score
258 g/km
298 g/km
Trunk score
650 L
23.0 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
253 hp/t
188 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
217 hp/t
162 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8
Consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK13.1 L/100 km18 mpg US21.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.43 LC100 km22.93 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi31.26 LC100 mi36.89 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal1,965 L519 US gal432 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,914 LC/year3,439 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Is 323 kg lighter
  • Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 40 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8
Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.4 V8
4.4
VS
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8vsBMWX5 M (E70)4.4
5.0 V8
GLS 600 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8
4.4 V8
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8vsBMWX5 M (F95)4.4 V8
5.0 V8
GLS 600 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzMaybach GLS (X167)GLS 600 V8
4.4 V8
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8vsBMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8
5.0 V8
M50i V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8vsBMWX7 (G07)M50i V8
4.4 V8
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8vsBMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
5.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8vsBentleyBentayga4.0 V8
5.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8vsBentleyBentaygaFacelift 20204.0 V8
4.4 V8
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8vsBMWX6 M (E71)4.4 V8
5.0 V8
AMG GLS 63
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63
4.4 V8
50i
VS
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8vsBMWX6 (F16)50i
BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 vs Land Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 5.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster