Porsche Cayenne (955) · Facelift 2007
Car comparison
Porsche Cayenne (955) · Facelift 2007 Turbo 4.8 V8vsBMW X5 M (E70) 4.4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 M (E70)
4.4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Most powerful555 hp414 kW
- Lightest2,305 kg5,082 lb
- Best power-to-weight241 hp/t180 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption19.3 L/100 km12.2 mpg US14.6 mpg UK
- Largest trunk620 L
- Best overall score83/100
- Best economy score70/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Porsche Cayenne (955) Facelift 2007 Turbo 4.8 V8
- Fastest top speed275 km/h171 mph
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range671 km417 mi
- Best performance score80/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayenne (955)Facelift 2007Turbo 4.8 V8 | BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 500hp373kW | 555hp414kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 680Nm502lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,355kg5,192lb | 2,305kg5,082lb |
| Gross weight | 3,080kg6,790lb | 2,905kg6,404lb |
| Top speed | 275 km/h 171 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 73.7s99% target: 272 km/h / 169 mph Calculated | 63.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.1s | 4.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.2s Calculated | 16.9s |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9s Calculated | 4.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 22.5L/100 km10.5mpg US12.6mpg UK | 19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 212hp/t158kW/t96hp/1000 lb Calculated | 241hp/t180kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 297Nm/t199lb-ft/ton Calculated | 295Nm/t197lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 671km417mi Calculated | 612km380mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,806cc293cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,795mm189in | 4,851mm191in |
| Width | 1,928mm76in | 1,994mm79in |
| Height | 1,696mm67in | 1,764mm69in |
| Wheelbase | 2,855mm112in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,641mm65in | 1,660mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,656mm65in | 1,672mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 271mm11in | 207mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 620L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,770L | 1,750L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 325g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayenne (955) Facelift 2007 Turbo 4.8 V8: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne (955)Facelift 2007Turbo 4.8 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,250-4,500 rpm | 6,700 rpm |
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 6,000 rpm | 1,500-5,650 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayenne (955)Facelift 2007Turbo 4.8 V8 | BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.9 s | 4.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.1 s | 4.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.2 s | 16.9 s |
| Top speed | 275 km/h 171 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 177 km/h 110 mph | 178 km/h 111 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne (955)Facelift 2007Turbo 4.8 V8 | 500 hp 373 kW |
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 555 hp 414 kW |
BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4 has 55 hp more than Porsche Cayenne (955) Facelift 2007 Turbo 4.8 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayenne (955) Facelift 2007 Turbo 4.8 V8 and BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4: 55 hp (41 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne (955)Facelift 2007Turbo 4.8 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne (955)Facelift 2007Turbo 4.8 V8 | 2,355 kg 5,192 lb |
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 2,305 kg 5,082 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne (955)Facelift 2007Turbo 4.8 V8 | 275 km/h 171 mph |
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne (955)Facelift 2007Turbo 4.8 V8 | 5.1 s |
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 4.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4 and Porsche Cayenne (955) Facelift 2007 Turbo 4.8 V8: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne (955)Facelift 2007Turbo 4.8 V8 | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4 and Porsche Cayenne (955) Facelift 2007 Turbo 4.8 V8: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne (955)Facelift 2007Turbo 4.8 V8 | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 241 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne (955)Facelift 2007Turbo 4.8 V8 | 671 km 417 mi |
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 612 km 380 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne (955)Facelift 2007Turbo 4.8 V8 | 500 hp 373 kW | 5.1 s | 275 km/h 171 mph |
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 555 hp 414 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne (955)Facelift 2007Turbo 4.8 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne (955)Facelift 2007Turbo 4.8 V8 |
| 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 |
| 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne (955)Facelift 2007Turbo 4.8 V8 | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 5.1 s |
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne (955)Facelift 2007Turbo 4.8 V8 | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 241 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayenne (955)Facelift 2007Turbo 4.8 V8 | BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 500 hp 373 kW | 555 hp 414 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.1 s | 4.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 275 km/h 171 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,355 kg 5,192 lb | 2,305 kg 5,082 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 671 km 417 mi | 612 km 380 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 325 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 241 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayenne (955) Facelift 2007 Turbo 4.8 V8 | BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19 mpg UK | 13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.08 LC100 km | 24.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.96 LC100 mi | 39.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,235 L590 US gal492 UK gal | 2,085 L551 US gal459 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,911 LC/year | 3,649 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayenne (955) Facelift 2007 Turbo 4.8 V8
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 60 km (37 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4
- Has 55 hp more
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























