BMW X5 M (E70)
Car comparison
BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4vsMercedes-Benz M-class (W166) AMG ML 63 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz M-class (W166)
AMG ML 63 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) AMG ML 63 V8
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.7 L/100 km15.0 mpg US18.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions276 g/km
- Best estimated range788 km490 mi
- Largest trunk690 L
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score92/100
BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful555 hp414 kW
- Lightest2,305 kg5,082 lb
- Best power-to-weight241 hp/t180 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score83/100
- Best performance score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 555hp414kW | 523hp390kW |
| Torque | 680Nm502lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,305kg5,082lb | 2,345kg5,170lb |
| Gross weight | 2,905kg6,404lb | 3,050kg6,724lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 63.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 68.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.9s | 17.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 241hp/t180kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated | 223hp/t166kW/t101hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 295Nm/t197lb-ft/ton Calculated | 299Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 612km380mi Calculated | 788km490mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 5,461cc333cu in |
| Length | 4,851mm191in | 4,804mm189in |
| Width | 1,994mm79in | 1,926mm76in |
| Height | 1,764mm69in | 1,796mm71in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,915mm115in |
| Front track | 1,660mm65in | 1,648mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,672mm66in | 1,663mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 207mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 620L | 690L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,750L | 2,010L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 93L |
| CO2 emissions | 325g/km | 276g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) AMG ML 63 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 6,000 rpm | 1,500-5,650 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8 | 5,250-5,750 rpm | 1,750-5,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.9 s | 17.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 178 km/h 111 mph | 176 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 555 hp 414 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8 | 523 hp 390 kW |
BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4 has 32 hp more than Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) AMG ML 63 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) AMG ML 63 V8 and BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4: 32 hp (24 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 2,305 kg 5,082 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8 | 2,345 kg 5,170 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 4.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8 | 4.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4 and Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) AMG ML 63 V8: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) AMG ML 63 V8 and BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 241 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8 | 223 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 612 km 380 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8 | 788 km 490 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 555 hp 414 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8 | 523 hp 390 kW | 4.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 |
| 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8 |
| 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) AMG ML 63 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 241 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8 | 223 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 555 hp 414 kW | 523 hp 390 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,305 kg 5,082 lb | 2,345 kg 5,170 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 612 km 380 mi | 788 km 490 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 325 g/km | 276 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | 690 L 24.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 241 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 223 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4 | Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) AMG ML 63 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.33 LC100 km | 20.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 39.15 LC100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,085 L551 US gal459 UK gal | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,649 LC/year | 3,098 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4
- Has 32 hp more
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) AMG ML 63 V8
- Has 20 Nm more
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 177 km (110 mi) more estimated range
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
- Emits 49 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























