BMW X5 (F15)
Car comparison
BMW X5 (F15) 30d · Stage 3vsBMW X5 (F15) 30d · Stage 2vsBMW X5 (F15) 30d · Stage 1vsBMW X5 (F15) 30d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 (F15)
30d (Stage 2)
BMW X5 (F15)
30d (Stage 1)
BMW X5 (F15)
30d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 (F15) 30d (Stage 3) 400 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Fastest top speed266 km/h165 mph
- Most powerful400 hp298 kW
- Highest torque896 Nm661 lb-ft
- Lightest2,070 kg4,564 lb
- Best power-to-weight193 hp/t144 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions164 g/km
- Best estimated range1,371 km852 mi
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best overall score79/100
- Best performance score77/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 3)400 hp | BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 2)348 hp | BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 1)310 hp | BMWX5 (F15)30d258 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400hp298kW+142 hp | 348hp260kW+90 hp | 310hp231kW+52 hp | 258hp192kW |
| Torque | 896Nm661lb-ft+336 Nm | 784Nm578lb-ft+224 Nm | 700Nm516lb-ft+140 Nm | 560Nm413lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,070kg4,564lb |
| Gross weight | 2,780kg6,129lb | 2,780kg6,129lb | 2,780kg6,129lb | 2,780kg6,129lb |
| Top speed | 266 km/h 165 mph | 253 km/h 157 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.5s99% target: 263 km/h / 164 mph-16.1 s Calculated | 91.5s99% target: 250 km/h / 156 mph-11.0 s Calculated | 95.6s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph-7.0 s Calculated | 102.6s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s-1.7 s | 5.7s-1.2 s | 6.2s-0.8 s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.9s-15.9 s Calculated | 23.7s-12.1 s Calculated | 27.6s-8.1 s Calculated | 35.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s-1.5 s Calculated | 5.4s-1.1 s Calculated | 5.8s-0.7 s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.4s-1.5 s Calculated | 13.9s-1.1 s Calculated | 14.3s-0.6 s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated | 168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated | 150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 433Nm/t290lb-ft/ton Calculated | 379Nm/t253lb-ft/ton Calculated | 338Nm/t226lb-ft/ton Calculated | 271Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,371km852mi Calculated | 1,371km852mi Calculated | 1,371km852mi Calculated | 1,371km852mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,886mm192in | 4,886mm192in | 4,886mm192in | 4,886mm192in |
| Width | 1,938mm76in | 1,938mm76in | 1,938mm76in | 1,938mm76in |
| Height | 1,762mm69in | 1,762mm69in | 1,762mm69in | 1,762mm69in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,933mm115in | 2,933mm115in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | 1,644mm65in | 1,644mm65in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,650mm65in | 1,650mm65in | 1,650mm65in | 1,650mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 209mm8in | 209mm8in | 209mm8in | 209mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 650L | 650L | 650L | 650L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,870L | 1,870L | 1,870L | 1,870L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 85L | 85L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 164g/km | 164g/km | 164g/km | 164g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X5 (F15) 30d (Stage 3) 400 hp: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (F15) 30d (Stage 2) 348 hp: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (F15) 30d (Stage 1) 310 hp: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (F15) 30d 258 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 3)400 hp | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 2)348 hp | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 1)310 hp | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d258 hp | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 3)400 hp | BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 2)348 hp | BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 1)310 hp | BMWX5 (F15)30d258 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 5.4 s | 5.8 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 5.7 s | 6.2 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.9 s | 23.7 s | 27.6 s | 35.8 s |
| Top speed | 266 km/h 165 mph | 253 km/h 157 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.9 s | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 9.0 s | 9.2 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 11.7 s | 12.0 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.4 s | 13.9 s | 14.3 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph | 157 km/h 97 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 3)400 hp | 400 hp 298 kW |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 2)348 hp | 348 hp 260 kW |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 1)310 hp | 310 hp 231 kW |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d258 hp | 258 hp 192 kW |
BMW X5 (F15) 30d (Stage 3) 400 hp has 142 hp more than BMW X5 (F15) 30d 258 hp.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X5 (F15) 30d 258 hp and BMW X5 (F15) 30d (Stage 3) 400 hp: 142 hp (106 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 3)400 hp | 896 Nm 661 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 2)348 hp | 784 Nm 578 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 1)310 hp | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d258 hp | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 3)400 hp | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 2)348 hp | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 1)310 hp | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d258 hp | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 3)400 hp | 266 km/h 165 mph |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 2)348 hp | 253 km/h 157 mph |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 1)310 hp | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d258 hp | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 3)400 hp | 5.2 s |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 2)348 hp | 5.7 s |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 1)310 hp | 6.2 s |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d258 hp | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X5 (F15) 30d (Stage 3) 400 hp and BMW X5 (F15) 30d 258 hp: 1.7 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are BMW X5 (F15) 30d (Stage 2) 348 hp and BMW X5 (F15) 30d (Stage 1) 310 hp, separated by only 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 3)400 hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 2)348 hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 1)310 hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d258 hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 3)400 hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 2)348 hp | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 1)310 hp | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d258 hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 3)400 hp | 1,371 km 852 mi |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 2)348 hp | 1,371 km 852 mi |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 1)310 hp | 1,371 km 852 mi |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d258 hp | 1,371 km 852 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 3)400 hp | 400 hp 298 kW | 5.2 s | 266 km/h 165 mph |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 2)348 hp | 348 hp 260 kW | 5.7 s | 253 km/h 157 mph |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 1)310 hp | 310 hp 231 kW | 6.2 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d258 hp | 258 hp 192 kW | 6.9 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 3)400 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 2)348 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 1)310 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (F15)30d258 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 3)400 hp |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 2)348 hp |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 1)310 hp |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (F15)30d258 hp |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 (F15) 30d (Stage 3) 400 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 3)400 hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 2)348 hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 1)310 hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d258 hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 3)400 hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 2)348 hp | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 1)310 hp | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d258 hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 3)400 hp | BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 2)348 hp | BMWX5 (F15)30d (Stage 1)310 hp | BMWX5 (F15)30d258 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp 298 kW | 348 hp 260 kW | 310 hp 231 kW | 258 hp 192 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 896 Nm 661 lb-ft | 784 Nm 578 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 5.7 s | 6.2 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 266 km/h 165 mph | 253 km/h 157 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,371 km 852 mi | 1,371 km 852 mi | 1,371 km 852 mi | 1,371 km 852 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 164 g/km | 164 g/km | 164 g/km | 164 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X5 (F15) 30d (Stage 3) 400 hp | BMW X5 (F15) 30d (Stage 2) 348 hp | BMW X5 (F15) 30d (Stage 1) 310 hp | BMW X5 (F15) 30d 258 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X5 (F15) 30d (Stage 3) 400 hp
- Has 52 hp more
- Has 112 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X5 (F15) 30d (Stage 2) 348 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























