BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33)
Car comparison
BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33) 430ivsBMW X5 (F15) 30d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 (F15)
30d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 (F15) 30d
- Most powerful258 hp192 kW
- Highest torque560 Nm413 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,371 km852 mi
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score82/100
BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33) 430i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,805 kg3,979 lb
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t104 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions156 g/km
- Best performance score59/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)430i | BMWX5 (F15)30d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252hp188kW | 258hp192kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 560Nm413lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,805kg3,979lb | 2,070kg4,564lb |
| Gross weight | 2,255kg4,971lb | 2,780kg6,129lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 97.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 102.6s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.4s Calculated | 35.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated | 271Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 896km556mi Calculated | 1,371km852mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,638mm183in | 4,886mm192in |
| Width | 1,825mm72in | 1,938mm76in |
| Height | 1,399mm55in | 1,762mm69in |
| Wheelbase | 2,810mm111in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,544mm61in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,590mm63in | 1,650mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 145mm6in | 209mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 370L | 650L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,870L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 156g/km | 164g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33) 430i: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (F15) 30d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)430i | 5,200 rpm | 1,450-4,800 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)430i | BMWX5 (F15)30d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.4 s | 35.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)430i | 252 hp 188 kW |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d | 258 hp 192 kW |
BMW X5 (F15) 30d has 6 hp more than BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33) 430i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33) 430i and BMW X5 (F15) 30d: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)430i | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)430i | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)430i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)430i | 6.4 s |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d | 6.9 s |
Although BMW X5 (F15) 30d has more power, BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33) 430i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33) 430i and BMW X5 (F15) 30d: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)430i | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X5 (F15) 30d and BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33) 430i: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)430i | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)430i | 896 km 556 mi |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d | 1,371 km 852 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)430i | 252 hp 188 kW | 6.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d | 258 hp 192 kW | 6.9 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)430i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (F15)30d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)430i |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (F15)30d |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33) 430i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)430i | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)430i | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)430i | BMWX5 (F15)30d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp 188 kW | 258 hp 192 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 896 km 556 mi | 1,371 km 852 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 156 g/km | 164 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33) 430i | BMW X5 (F15) 30d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33) 430i
- Is 265 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 8 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
BMW X5 (F15) 30d
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 210 Nm more
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 475 km (295 mi) more estimated range
- Has 280 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























