BMW X4 (F26)
Car comparison
BMW X4 (F26) 30dvsBMW X5 (F15) 30d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 (F15)
30d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X4 (F26) 30d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed234 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful258 hp192 kW
- Highest torque560 Nm413 lb-ft
- Lightest1,820 kg4,012 lb
- Best power-to-weight142 hp/t106 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions156 g/km
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score91/100
BMW X5 (F15) 30d
- Best estimated range1,371 km852 mi
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX4 (F26)30d | BMWX5 (F15)30d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258hp192kW | 258hp192kW |
| Torque | 560Nm413lb-ft | 560Nm413lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,820kg4,012lb | 2,070kg4,564lb |
| Gross weight | 2,410kg5,313lb | 2,780kg6,129lb |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.9s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated | 102.6s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.7s Calculated | 35.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 308Nm/t206lb-ft/ton Calculated | 271Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,136km706mi Calculated | 1,371km852mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,671mm184in | 4,886mm192in |
| Width | 1,881mm74in | 1,938mm76in |
| Height | 1,624mm64in | 1,762mm69in |
| Wheelbase | 2,810mm111in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,616mm64in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,632mm64in | 1,650mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 204mm8in | 209mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 650L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,400L | 1,870L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 67L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 156g/km | 164g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X4 (F26) 30d: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (F15) 30d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)30d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX4 (F26)30d | BMWX5 (F15)30d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.7 s | 35.8 s |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)30d | 258 hp 192 kW |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d | 258 hp 192 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)30d | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)30d | 1,820 kg 4,012 lb |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)30d | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)30d | 5.8 s |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X4 (F26) 30d and BMW X5 (F15) 30d: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)30d | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)30d | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)30d | 1,136 km 706 mi |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d | 1,371 km 852 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)30d | 258 hp 192 kW | 5.8 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d | 258 hp 192 kW | 6.9 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)30d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (F15)30d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)30d |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (F15)30d |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X4 (F26) 30d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)30d | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)30d | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (F15)30d | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX4 (F26)30d | BMWX5 (F15)30d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp 192 kW | 258 hp 192 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,820 kg 4,012 lb | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,136 km 706 mi | 1,371 km 852 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 156 g/km | 164 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X4 (F26) 30d | BMW X5 (F15) 30d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X4 (F26) 30d
- Is 250 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 8 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
BMW X5 (F15) 30d
- Has 235 km (146 mi) more estimated range
- Has 150 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























