BMW X6 (E71)
Car comparison
BMW X6 (E71) 40dvsBMW X5 (E70) 35d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 (E70)
35d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X6 (E71) 40d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lightest2,110 kg4,652 lb
- Best power-to-weight145 hp/t108 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions198 g/km
- Best estimated range1,133 km704 mi
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score87/100
BMW X5 (E70) 35d
- Largest trunk620 L
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX6 (E71)40d | BMWX5 (E70)35d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 286hp213kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 580Nm428lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,110kg4,652lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Gross weight | 2,710kg5,975lb | 2,790kg6,151lb |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.5s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 80.5s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.6s Calculated | 40.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 136hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated | 275Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,133km704mi Calculated | 1,024km636mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,877mm192in | 4,854mm191in |
| Width | 1,983mm78in | 1,933mm76in |
| Height | 1,690mm67in | 1,739mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | 1,558mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,706mm67in | 1,581mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 212mm8in | 222mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 570L | 620L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,450L | 1,750L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 198g/km | 220g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X6 (E71) 40d: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (E70) 35d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)40d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 4,400 rpm | 1,750-2,250 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX6 (E71)40d | BMWX5 (E70)35d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.6 s | 40.1 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)40d | 306 hp 228 kW |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 286 hp 213 kW |
BMW X6 (E71) 40d has 20 hp more than BMW X5 (E70) 35d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X5 (E70) 35d and BMW X6 (E71) 40d: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)40d | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)40d | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)40d | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 216 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)40d | 6.5 s |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X6 (E71) 40d and BMW X5 (E70) 35d: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)40d | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X6 (E71) 40d and BMW X5 (E70) 35d: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)40d | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)40d | 1,133 km 704 mi |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 1,024 km 636 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)40d | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.5 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 286 hp 213 kW | 7.0 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)40d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (E70)35d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)40d |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (E70)35d |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X6 (E71) 40d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)40d | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)40d | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX6 (E71)40d | BMWX5 (E70)35d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 286 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,133 km 704 mi | 1,024 km 636 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 198 g/km | 220 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X6 (E71) 40d | BMW X5 (E70) 35d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 14.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 2,179 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X6 (E71) 40d
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 109 km (68 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 22 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
BMW X5 (E70) 35d
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























