BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010 50ivsBMW X5 (E70) 35d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 (E70)
35d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful407 hp304 kW
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight186 hp/t139 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk620 L
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best practicality score90/100
BMW X5 (E70) 35d
- Lightest2,110 kg4,652 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions220 g/km
- Best estimated range1,024 km636 mi
- Best economy score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i | BMWX5 (E70)35d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 407hp304kW | 286hp213kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 580Nm428lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,190kg4,828lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Gross weight | 2,870kg6,327lb | 2,790kg6,151lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.5s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 80.5s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.4s Calculated | 40.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.5L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 186hp/t139kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated | 136hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 274Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated | 275Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 680km423mi Calculated | 1,024km636mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,857mm191in | 4,854mm191in |
| Width | 1,933mm76in | 1,933mm76in |
| Height | 1,776mm70in | 1,739mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,640mm65in | 1,558mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,646mm65in | 1,581mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 222mm9in | 222mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 620L | 620L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,750L | 1,750L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 292g/km | 220g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (E70) 35d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i | 5,500-6,400 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 4,400 rpm | 1,750-2,250 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i | BMWX5 (E70)35d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.4 s | 40.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i | 407 hp 304 kW |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 286 hp 213 kW |
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i has 121 hp more than BMW X5 (E70) 35d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X5 (E70) 35d and BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i: 121 hp (90 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i | 2,190 kg 4,828 lb |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 216 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i | 5.5 s |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i and BMW X5 (E70) 35d: 1.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X5 (E70) 35d and BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i: 4.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i | 680 km 423 mi |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 1,024 km 636 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i | 407 hp 304 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 286 hp 213 kW | 7.0 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (E70)35d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i |
| 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (E70)35d |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i | BMWX5 (E70)35d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 407 hp 304 kW | 286 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,190 kg 4,828 lb | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 680 km 423 mi | 1,024 km 636 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 292 g/km | 220 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i | BMW X5 (E70) 35d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.88 LC100 km | 14.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 35.20 LC100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,281 LC/year | 2,179 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i
- Has 121 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 34 km/h (21 mph) higher top speed
- Has 50 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X5 (E70) 35d
- Is 80 kg lighter
- Uses 4.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 344 km (214 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 72 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























