Car comparison

Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI TurbovsBMW X5 (E70) 3.0sd

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-7

2.3 DISI Turbo

260 hp2261 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2007-2009
VS

BMW X5 (E70)

3.0sd

286 hp2993 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2007-2008

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X5 (E70) 3.0sd

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.0 s
  • Most powerful
    286 hp
    213 kW
  • Highest torque
    580 Nm
    428 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.2 L/100 km
    28.7 mpg US
    34.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.3 L/100 km
    22.8 mpg US
    27.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,037 km
    644 mi
  • Largest trunk
    620 L
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    57/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo

  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,740 kg
    3,836 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    149 hp/t
    111 kW/t
    6.7 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-72.3 DISI TurboBMWX5 (E70)3.0sd
Power
260hp194kW
286hp213kW
Torque
380Nm280lb-ft
580Nm428lb-ft
Curb weight
1,740kg3,836lb
2,185kg4,817lb
Gross weight
2,301kg5,073lb
2,790kg6,151lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
216 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
87.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
81.8s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.0s
7.0s
0-200 km/h
40.5s
Calculated
40.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.6s
Calculated
6.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.8s
Calculated
15.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton
Calculated
265Nm/t178lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
676km420mi
Calculated
1,037km644mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,261cc138cu in
2,993cc183cu in
Length
4,675mm184in
4,854mm191in
Width
1,870mm74in
1,933mm76in
Height
1,645mm65in
1,739mm68in
Wheelbase
2,750mm108in
2,933mm115in
Front track
1,615mm64in
1,576mm62in
Rear track
1,610mm63in
1,576mm62in
Trunk volume
455L
620L
Max trunk volume
774L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
69L
85L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI TurboBMW X5 (E70) 3.0sdPowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo: Power / Torque
  • BMW X5 (E70) 3.0sd: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo5,500 rpm3,000 rpm5,750 rpm
BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd4,400 rpm1,750-2,250 rpm4,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-72.3 DISI TurboBMWX5 (E70)3.0sd
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.6 s
6.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.0 s
7.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
40.5 s
40.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
216 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.8 s
15.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
145 km/h
90 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
260 hp
194 kW
BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd
286 hp
213 kW

BMW X5 (E70) 3.0sd has 26 hp more than Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo and BMW X5 (E70) 3.0sd: 26 hp (19 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd
580 Nm
428 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd
2,185 kg
4,817 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd
216 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo8.0 s
BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd7.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X5 (E70) 3.0sd and Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo: 1.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X5 (E70) 3.0sd and Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo: 2.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
676 km
420 mi
BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd
1,037 km
644 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
260 hp
194 kW
8.0 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd
286 hp
213 kW
7.0 s
216 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,675 mm
184.1 in
Height
1,645 mm
64.8 in
BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd
Power
286 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
620 L
21.9 cu ft
Length
4,854 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,739 mm
68.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd
Power
286 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

BMW X5 (E70) 3.0sd is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
8.0 s
BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
7.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-72.3 DISI TurboBMWX5 (E70)3.0sd
Power
260 hp
194 kW
286 hp
213 kW
Torque
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
580 Nm
428 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.0 s
7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
216 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
2,185 kg
4,817 lb
Fuel consumption
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,675 mm
184.1 in
Height
1,645 mm
64.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
620 L
21.9 cu ft
Length
4,854 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,739 mm
68.5 in
Range score
676 km
420 mi
1,037 km
644 mi
Trunk score
455 L
16.1 cu ft
620 L
21.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-7 2.3 DISI TurboBMW X5 (E70) 3.0sd
Consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.85 LC100 km14.35 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi28.73 LC100 mi23.09 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,678 LC/year2,153 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo

  • Is 445 kg lighter
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

BMW X5 (E70) 3.0sd

  • Has 26 hp more
  • Has 200 Nm more
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 360 km (224 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 165 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo
BMW X5 (E70) 3.0sd
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.3 DISI Turbo
3.5
VS
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI TurbovsNissanMurano II (Z51)3.5
3.0sd
35i
VS
BMWX5 (E70)3.0sdvsBMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i
2.3 DISI Turbo
3.0si
VS
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI TurbovsBMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si
3.0sd
4.6is
VS
BMWX5 (E70)3.0sdvsBMWX5 (E53)4.6is
2.3 DISI Turbo
3.0si
VS
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI TurbovsBMWX5 (E70)3.0si
3.0sd
35i
VS
BMWX5 (E70)3.0sdvsBMWX5 (F15)35i
2.3 DISI Turbo
GLK 280 V6
VS
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI TurbovsMercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6
3.0sd
30d
VS
BMWX5 (E70)3.0sdvsBMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202330d
2.3 DISI Turbo
28i
VS
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI TurbovsBMWX1 (E84)28i
3.0sd
30d
VS
BMWX5 (E70)3.0sdvsBMWX5 (G05)30d
2.3 DISI Turbo
3.5 V6
VS
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI TurbovsNissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
2.3 DISI Turbo
3.2 FSI V6
VS
MazdaCX-72.3 DISI TurbovsAUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6
Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo vs BMW X5 (E70) 3.0sd - car comparison - FastVsFaster