BMW X3 (F25 LCI) · Facelift 2014
Car comparison
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) · Facelift 2014 35ivsBMW X6 (F16) 40d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X6 (F16)
40d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X6 (F16) 40d
- Most powerful313 hp233 kW
- Highest torque630 Nm465 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions165 g/km
- Best estimated range1,349 km838 mi
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score87/100
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.6 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Lightest1,815 kg4,001 lb
- Best power-to-weight169 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk550 L
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | BMWX6 (F16)40d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 313hp233kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 630Nm465lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,815kg4,001lb | 2,105kg4,641lb |
| Gross weight | 2,405kg5,302lb | 2,820kg6,217lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.0s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 74.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.6s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.9s Calculated | 24.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 169hp/t126kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 299Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 807km502mi Calculated | 1,349km838mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,657mm183in | 4,909mm193in |
| Width | 1,881mm74in | 1,989mm78in |
| Height | 1,661mm65in | 1,702mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,810mm111in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,594mm63in | 1,640mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,610mm63in | 1,706mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 204mm8in | 212mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,600L | 1,525L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 67L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 193g/km | 165g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35i: Power / Torque
- BMW X6 (F16) 40d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 5,800-6,400 rpm | 1,200-5,000 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | BMWX6 (F16)40d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.3 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.6 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.9 s | 24.2 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 306 hp 228 kW |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 313 hp 233 kW |
BMW X6 (F16) 40d has 7 hp more than BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35i and BMW X6 (F16) 40d: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 1,815 kg 4,001 lb |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 2,105 kg 4,641 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 5.6 s |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 5.8 s |
Although BMW X6 (F16) 40d has more power, BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35i and BMW X6 (F16) 40d: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 40d and BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35i: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 807 km 502 mi |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 1,349 km 838 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 306 hp 228 kW | 5.6 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 313 hp 233 kW | 5.8 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX6 (F16)40d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX6 (F16)40d |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X6 (F16) 40d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i | BMWX6 (F16)40d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 313 hp 233 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.6 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,815 kg 4,001 lb | 2,105 kg 4,641 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 807 km 502 mi | 1,349 km 838 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 193 g/km | 165 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35i | BMW X6 (F16) 40d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.53 LC100 km | 11.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,179 LC/year | 1,654 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35i
- Is 290 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X6 (F16) 40d
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 230 Nm more
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 542 km (337 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 28 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























