BMW X6 (E71)
Car comparison
BMW X6 (E71) 35ivsBMW X3 (F25 LCI) · Facelift 2014 35d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X3 (F25 LCI) · Facelift 2014
35d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Most powerful313 hp233 kW
- Highest torque630 Nm465 lb-ft
- Lightest1,860 kg4,101 lb
- Best power-to-weight168 hp/t125 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions157 g/km
- Best estimated range1,117 km694 mi
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score68/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score86/100
BMW X6 (E71) 35i
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Largest trunk570 L
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX6 (E71)35i | BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 313hp233kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 630Nm465lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 1,860kg4,101lb |
| Gross weight | 2,670kg5,886lb | 2,440kg5,379lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 94.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 65.3s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.7s Calculated | 20.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 13.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 339Nm/t227lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 842km523mi Calculated | 1,117km694mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,877mm192in | 4,657mm183in |
| Width | 1,983mm78in | 1,881mm74in |
| Height | 1,690mm67in | 1,661mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,810mm111in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | 1,594mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,706mm67in | 1,610mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 212mm8in | 204mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 570L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,450L | 1,600L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 67L |
| CO2 emissions | 236g/km | 157g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X6 (E71) 35i: Power / Torque
- BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 5,800 rpm | 1,200-5,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX6 (E71)35i | BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.7 s | 20.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 13.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 170 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 306 hp 228 kW |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 313 hp 233 kW |
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35d has 7 hp more than BMW X6 (E71) 35i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X6 (E71) 35i and BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35d: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 1,860 kg 4,101 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 6.7 s |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 5.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35d and BMW X6 (E71) 35i: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35d and BMW X6 (E71) 35i: 4.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 842 km 523 mi |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 1,117 km 694 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 313 hp 233 kW | 5.3 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX6 (E71)35i | BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 313 hp 233 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb | 1,860 kg 4,101 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 842 km 523 mi | 1,117 km 694 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 236 g/km | 157 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X6 (E71) 35i | BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.68 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,651 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X6 (E71) 35i
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35d
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 230 Nm more
- Is 210 kg lighter
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 4.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 275 km (171 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 79 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























