BMW X3 (F25 LCI) · Facelift 2014
Car comparison
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) · Facelift 2014 20dvsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 20d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.1 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,745 kg3,847 lb
- Best power-to-weight109 hp/t81 kW/t9.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,288 km801 mi
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions137 g/km
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420d | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | 1,872kg4,127lb |
| Gross weight | 2,365kg5,214lb | 2,390kg5,269lb |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 86.8s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 52.3s Calculated | 66.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 101hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,288km801mi Calculated | 1,058km657mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,657mm183in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,881mm74in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,661mm65in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,810mm111in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,616mm64in | - |
| Rear track | 1,632mm64in | - |
| Ground clearance | 204mm8in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,600L | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 67L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 138g/km | 137g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 20d: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420d | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 52.3 s | 66.9 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420d | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420d | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 1,872 kg 4,127 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420d | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420d | 8.1 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 8.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 20d and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420d | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 101 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420d | 1,288 km 801 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 1,058 km 657 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420d | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.1 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.4 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420d |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420d | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 101 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420d | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | 1,872 kg 4,127 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,288 km 801 mi | 1,058 km 657 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 138 g/km | 137 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 101 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 20d | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.10 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,365 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 20d
- Is 127 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 231 km (143 mi) more estimated range
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
- Emits 1 g/km less CO2
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























