BMW X6 (E71)
Car comparison
BMW X6 (E71) 35ivsBMW X3 (F25) 28i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X3 (F25)
28i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X6 (E71) 35i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best estimated range842 km523 mi
- Largest trunk570 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score59/100
BMW X3 (F25) 28i
- Lightest1,745 kg3,847 lb
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions210 g/km
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX6 (E71)35i | BMWX3 (F25)28i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 258hp192kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 310Nm229lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 1,745kg3,847lb |
| Gross weight | 2,670kg5,886lb | 2,305kg5,082lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 94.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 79.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.7s Calculated | 30.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 842km523mi Calculated | 744km463mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 2,996cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,877mm192in | 4,648mm183in |
| Width | 1,983mm78in | 1,881mm74in |
| Height | 1,690mm67in | 1,661mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,810mm111in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | 1,616mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,706mm67in | 1,632mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 212mm8in | 212mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 570L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,450L | 1,600L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 67L |
| CO2 emissions | 236g/km | 210g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X6 (E71) 35i: Power / Torque
- BMW X3 (F25) 28i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 5,800 rpm | 1,200-5,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 6,600 rpm | 2,600-3,000 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX6 (E71)35i | BMWX3 (F25)28i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.7 s | 30.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 154 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 306 hp 228 kW |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 258 hp 192 kW |
BMW X6 (E71) 35i has 48 hp more than BMW X3 (F25) 28i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X3 (F25) 28i and BMW X6 (E71) 35i: 48 hp (36 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 6.7 s |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X6 (E71) 35i and BMW X3 (F25) 28i: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X3 (F25) 28i and BMW X6 (E71) 35i: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 842 km 523 mi |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 744 km 463 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 258 hp 192 kW | 6.9 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX3 (F25)28i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX3 (F25)28i |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X6 (E71) 35i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX6 (E71)35i | BMWX3 (F25)28i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 258 hp 192 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 842 km 523 mi | 744 km 463 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 236 g/km | 210 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X6 (E71) 35i | BMW X3 (F25) 28i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.68 LC100 km | 15.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,651 LC/year | 2,363 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X6 (E71) 35i
- Has 48 hp more
- Has 90 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 97 km (60 mi) more estimated range
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X3 (F25) 28i
- Is 325 kg lighter
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 26 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























