BMW X3 (E83) · Facelift 2006
Car comparison
BMW X3 (E83) · Facelift 2006 30ivsMazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMazda CX-7
2.3 DISI Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 30i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful272 hp203 kW
- Lightest1,740 kg3,836 lb
- Best power-to-weight156 hp/t117 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.4 L/100 km17.6 mpg US21.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range705 km438 mi
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score83/100
Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i | MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 272hp203kW | 260hp194kW |
| Torque | 315Nm232lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,740kg3,836lb | 1,740kg3,836lb |
| Gross weight | 2,260kg4,982lb | 2,301kg5,073lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 75.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 87.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.6s Calculated | 40.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 156hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 181Nm/t121lb-ft/ton Calculated | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 705km438mi Calculated | 676km420mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | 2,261cc138cu in |
| Length | 4,569mm180in | 4,675mm184in |
| Width | 1,853mm73in | 1,870mm74in |
| Height | 1,674mm66in | 1,645mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,795mm110in | 2,750mm108in |
| Front track | 1,524mm60in | 1,615mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,542mm61in | 1,610mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 201mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 455L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,560L | 774L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 67L | 69L |
| CO2 emissions | 229g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 30i: Power / Torque
- Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i | 6,650 rpm | 2,750 rpm | 6,900 rpm |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i | MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.6 s | 40.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i | 272 hp 203 kW |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | 260 hp 194 kW |
BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 30i has 12 hp more than Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo and BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 30i: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i | 315 Nm 232 lb-ft |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i | 7.2 s |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 30i and Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 30i and Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i | 705 km 438 mi |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | 676 km 420 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i | 272 hp 203 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | 260 hp 194 kW | 8.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i |
| 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 30i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i | MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 272 hp 203 kW | 260 hp 194 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 315 Nm 232 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 705 km 438 mi | 676 km 420 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 229 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 30i | Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.63 LC100 km | 17.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.76 LC100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,494 LC/year | 2,678 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 30i
- Has 12 hp more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 29 km (18 mi) more estimated range
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo
- Has 65 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























