Car comparison

BMW X2 (F39) 25dvsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X2 (F39)

25d

231 hp1995 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2018
VS

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 D5

235 hp1969 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X2 (F39) 25d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    237 km/h
    147 mph
  • Lightest
    1,585 kg
    3,494 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    146 hp/t
    109 kW/t
    6.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5

  • Most powerful
    235 hp
    175 kW
  • Highest torque
    480 Nm
    354 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    1,183 km
    735 mi
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX2 (F39)25dVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
Power
231hp172kW
235hp175kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
480Nm354lb-ft
Curb weight
1,585kg3,494lb
1,976kg4,356lb
Gross weight
2,180kg4,806lb
2,470kg5,445lb
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
70.7s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
81.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.7s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
25.9s
Calculated
37.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.4s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.7s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton
Calculated
243Nm/t163lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
962km598mi
Calculated
1,183km735mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,360mm172in
4,688mm185in
Width
1,824mm72in
1,902mm75in
Height
1,526mm60in
1,658mm65in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,865mm113in
Front track
1,563mm62in
1,668mm66in
Rear track
1,562mm61in
1,673mm66in
Ground clearance
182mm7in
216mm9in
Trunk volume
470L
505L
Max trunk volume
1,355L
1,432L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
71L
CO2 emissions-
158g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X2 (F39) 25dVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D5PowerTorque
  • BMW X2 (F39) 25d: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX2 (F39)25d4,400 rpm1,500-3,000 rpm4,650 rpm
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D54,000 rpm1,750-2,250 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX2 (F39)25dVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.4 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.7 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.9 s
37.3 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.7 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
159 km/h
99 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)25d
231 hp
172 kW
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
235 hp
175 kW

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 has 4 hp more than BMW X2 (F39) 25d.

The biggest power difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 25d and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)25d
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
480 Nm
354 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)25d
1,585 kg
3,494 lb
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
1,976 kg
4,356 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)25d
237 km/h
147 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
220 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)25d6.7 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D57.2 s

Although Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 has more power, BMW X2 (F39) 25d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 25d and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)25d
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 25d and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)25d
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)25d
962 km
598 mi
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
1,183 km
735 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX2 (F39)25d
231 hp
172 kW
6.7 s
237 km/h
147 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
235 hp
175 kW
7.2 s
220 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX2 (F39)25d
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,360 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,526 mm
60.1 in
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
Power
235 hp
175 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX2 (F39)25d
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
Power
235 hp
175 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

BMW X2 (F39) 25d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX2 (F39)25d
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
6.7 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX2 (F39)25d
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX2 (F39)25dVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
Power
231 hp
172 kW
235 hp
175 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.7 s
7.2 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,585 kg
3,494 lb
1,976 kg
4,356 lb
Fuel consumption
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,360 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,526 mm
60.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Range score
962 km
598 mi
1,183 km
735 mi
CO2 score
-
158 g/km
Trunk score
470 L
16.6 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X2 (F39) 25dVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D5
Consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.28 LC100 km10.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.93 LC100 mi16.90 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used795 L210 US gal175 UK gal900 L238 US gal198 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,391 LC/year1,575 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X2 (F39) 25d

  • Is 391 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Has 30 Nm more
  • Has 221 km (137 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 35 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X2 (F39) 25d
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

BMW X2 (F39) 25d vs Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster