BMW X2 (F39)
Car comparison
BMW X2 (F39) 25dvsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X2 (F39) 25d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Lightest1,585 kg3,494 lb
- Best power-to-weight146 hp/t109 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score93/100
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5
- Most powerful235 hp175 kW
- Highest torque480 Nm354 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,183 km735 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX2 (F39)25d | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 235hp175kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 480Nm354lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,585kg3,494lb | 1,976kg4,356lb |
| Gross weight | 2,180kg4,806lb | 2,470kg5,445lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.7s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 81.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.9s Calculated | 37.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated | 243Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 962km598mi Calculated | 1,183km735mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,360mm172in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,526mm60in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,673mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 182mm7in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,355L | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 158g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X2 (F39) 25d: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX2 (F39)25d | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.9 s | 37.3 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 231 hp 172 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 235 hp 175 kW |
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 has 4 hp more than BMW X2 (F39) 25d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 25d and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 1,976 kg 4,356 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 6.7 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 7.2 s |
Although Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 has more power, BMW X2 (F39) 25d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 25d and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 25d and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 962 km 598 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 1,183 km 735 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.7 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 235 hp 175 kW | 7.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X2 (F39) 25d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX2 (F39)25d | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 235 hp 175 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | 1,976 kg 4,356 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 962 km 598 mi | 1,183 km 735 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 158 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X2 (F39) 25d | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.28 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,391 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X2 (F39) 25d
- Is 391 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 221 km (137 mi) more estimated range
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























