Car comparison

BMW X2 (F39) 25dvsMercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017 GLA 250

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X2 (F39)

25d

231 hp1995 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2018
VS

Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017

GLA 250

211 hp1991 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2017-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X2 (F39) 25d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    237 km/h
    147 mph
  • Most powerful
    231 hp
    172 kW
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    962 km
    598 mi
  • Largest trunk
    470 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX2 (F39)25dMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250
Power
231hp172kW
211hp157kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,585kg3,494lb
1,360kg2,998lb
Gross weight
2,180kg4,806lb
1,970kg4,343lb
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
To 99% top speed
70.9s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
68.6s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.7s
6.7s
0-200 km/h
25.9s
Calculated
26.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.4s
Calculated
6.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.7s
Calculated
14.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
155hp/t116kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton
Calculated
257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
962km598mi
Calculated
806km501mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,991cc121cu in
Length
4,360mm172in
4,424mm174in
Width
1,824mm72in
1,804mm71in
Height
1,526mm60in
1,494mm59in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,699mm106in
Front track
1,563mm62in
1,569mm62in
Rear track
1,562mm61in
1,560mm61in
Ground clearance
182mm7in
-
Trunk volume
470L
421L
Max trunk volume
1,355L
1,235L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
50L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X2 (F39) 25dMercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250PowerTorque
  • BMW X2 (F39) 25d: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX2 (F39)25d4,400 rpm1,500-3,000 rpm4,650 rpm
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 2505,500 rpm1,200-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX2 (F39)25dMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.4 s
6.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.7 s
6.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.9 s
26.0 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.7 s
14.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
159 km/h
99 mph
159 km/h
99 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)25d
231 hp
172 kW
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250
211 hp
157 kW

BMW X2 (F39) 25d has 20 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250 and BMW X2 (F39) 25d: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)25d
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)25d
1,585 kg
3,494 lb
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250
1,360 kg
2,998 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)25d
237 km/h
147 mph
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250
235 km/h
146 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)25d6.7 s
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 2506.7 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)25d
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 25d and Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)25d
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250
155 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)25d
962 km
598 mi
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250
806 km
501 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX2 (F39)25d
231 hp
172 kW
6.7 s
237 km/h
147 mph
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250
211 hp
157 kW
6.7 s
235 km/h
146 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX2 (F39)25d
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,360 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,526 mm
60.1 in
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
421 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,424 mm
174.2 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX2 (F39)25d
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

BMW X2 (F39) 25d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX2 (F39)25d
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
6.7 s
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
6.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX2 (F39)25d
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250
155 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX2 (F39)25dMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250
Power
231 hp
172 kW
211 hp
157 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.7 s
6.7 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Lightness
1,585 kg
3,494 lb
1,360 kg
2,998 lb
Fuel consumption
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,360 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,526 mm
60.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
421 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,424 mm
174.2 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
Range score
962 km
598 mi
806 km
501 mi
Trunk score
470 L
16.6 cu ft
421 L
14.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
155 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X2 (F39) 25dMercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250
Consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.28 LC100 km10.85 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.93 LC100 mi17.46 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used795 L210 US gal175 UK gal930 L246 US gal205 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,391 LC/year1,628 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X2 (F39) 25d

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 100 Nm more
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 156 km (97 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 49 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X2 (F39) 25d
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 250
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

BMW X2 (F39) 25d vs Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017 GLA 250 - car comparison - FastVsFaster