BMW X2 (F39)
Car comparison
BMW X2 (F39) 25dvsMercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017 GLA 250
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017
GLA 250
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X2 (F39) 25d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range962 km598 mi
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250
- Lightest1,360 kg2,998 lb
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t116 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX2 (F39)25d | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,585kg3,494lb | 1,360kg2,998lb |
| Gross weight | 2,180kg4,806lb | 1,970kg4,343lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.9s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 68.6s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.9s Calculated | 26.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t116kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated | 257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 962km598mi Calculated | 806km501mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,360mm172in | 4,424mm174in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,804mm71in |
| Height | 1,526mm60in | 1,494mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,699mm106in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,569mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,560mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 182mm7in | - |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 421L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,355L | 1,235L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X2 (F39) 25d: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX2 (F39)25d | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.9 s | 26.0 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 231 hp 172 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 211 hp 157 kW |
BMW X2 (F39) 25d has 20 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250 and BMW X2 (F39) 25d: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 6.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 6.7 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 25d and Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 962 km 598 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 806 km 501 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.7 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 211 hp 157 kW | 6.7 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X2 (F39) 25d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX2 (F39)25d | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 962 km 598 mi | 806 km 501 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 421 L 14.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X2 (F39) 25d | Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.28 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,391 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X2 (F39) 25d
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 156 km (97 mi) more estimated range
- Has 49 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250
- Is 225 kg lighter
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























