Car comparison

BMW X2 (F39) 20ivsLynk & Co 01 1.5 T3

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X2 (F39)

20i

192 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2018
VS

Lynk & Co 01

1.5 T3

180 hp1477 ccHybridFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2018-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X2 (F39) 20i

  • Fastest top speed
    224 km/h
    139 mph
  • Most powerful
    192 hp
    143 kW
  • Highest torque
    280 Nm
    207 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,540 kg
    3,395 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    125 hp/t
    93 kW/t
    8.0 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100

Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    1.7 L/100 km
    138.4 mpg US
    166.2 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    100/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX2 (F39)20iLynk & Co011.5 T3
Power
192hp143kW
180hp134kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
265Nm195lb-ft
Curb weight
1,540kg3,395lb
1,769kg3,900lb
Gross weight
2,145kg4,729lb
-
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
To 99% top speed
74.5s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
77.4s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
33.0s
Calculated
47.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
1.7L/100 km138.4mpg US166.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton
Calculated
150Nm/t100lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
984km611mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,477cc90cu in
Length
4,360mm172in
4,512mm178in
Width
1,824mm72in
1,857mm73in
Height
1,526mm60in
1,673mm66in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,734mm108in
Front track
1,563mm62in
1,592mm63in
Rear track
1,562mm61in
1,597mm63in
Ground clearance
182mm7in
211mm8in
Trunk volume
470L
-
Max trunk volume
1,355L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
61L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X2 (F39) 20iLynk & Co 01 1.5 T3PowerTorque
  • BMW X2 (F39) 20i: Power / Torque
  • Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX2 (F39)20i5,000-6,000 rpm1,350-4,600 rpm6,250 rpm
Lynk & Co011.5 T35,500 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX2 (F39)20iLynk & Co011.5 T3
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
33.0 s
47.1 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
94 mph
147 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
192 hp
143 kW
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
180 hp
134 kW

BMW X2 (F39) 20i has 12 hp more than Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3.

The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3 and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 12 hp (9 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
265 Nm
195 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
1,769 kg
3,900 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
224 km/h
139 mph
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
210 km/h
130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i7.4 s
Lynk & Co011.5 T37.3 s

Although BMW X2 (F39) 20i has more power, Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3 and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
1.7 L/100 km
138.4 mpg US
166.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3 and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 4.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX2 (F39)20i
192 hp
143 kW
7.4 s
224 km/h
139 mph
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
180 hp
134 kW
7.3 s
210 km/h
130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX2 (F39)20i
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,360 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,526 mm
60.1 in
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,512 mm
177.6 in
Height
1,673 mm
65.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX2 (F39)20i
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
1.7 L/100 km
138.4 mpg US
166.2 mpg UK

BMW X2 (F39) 20i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX2 (F39)20i
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
7.4 s
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
1.7 L/100 km
138.4 mpg US
166.2 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX2 (F39)20i
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
1.7 L/100 km
138.4 mpg US
166.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX2 (F39)20iLynk & Co011.5 T3
Power
192 hp
143 kW
180 hp
134 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
7.3 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Lightness
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
1,769 kg
3,900 lb
Fuel consumption
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
1.7 L/100 km
138.4 mpg US
166.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,360 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,526 mm
60.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,512 mm
177.6 in
Height
1,673 mm
65.9 in
Range score
984 km
611 mi
-
Trunk score
470 L
16.6 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X2 (F39) 20iLynk & Co 01 1.5 T3
Consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK1.7 L/100 km138.4 mpg US166.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.85 LC100 km2.98 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.46 LC100 mi4.79 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used930 L246 US gal205 UK gal255 L67 US gal56 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,628 LC/year446.25 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X2 (F39) 20i

  • Has 12 hp more
  • Has 15 Nm more
  • Is 229 kg lighter
  • Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3

  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 4.5 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X2 (F39) 20i
Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

20i
20i
VS
BMWX2 (F39)20ivsBMWX2 (U10)20i
1.5 T3
2.2d
VS
Lynk & Co011.5 T3vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
20i
20i
VS
BMWX2 (F39)20ivsBMWX1 (F48)20i
1.5 T3
GLA 220d
VS
Lynk & Co011.5 T3vsMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d
20i
20d
VS
BMWX2 (F39)20ivsBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420d
1.5 T3
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co011.5 T3vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI
20i
20i
VS
BMWX2 (F39)20ivsBMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i
1.5 T3
2.0 TDI
VS
Lynk & Co011.5 T3vsVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI
20i
Cooper S 2.0
VS
BMWX2 (F39)20ivsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
20i
30d
VS
BMWX2 (F39)20ivsBMWX7 (G07)30d
1.5 T3
2.0 D4
VS
Lynk & Co011.5 T3vsVolvoXC402.0 D4
1.5 T3
2.0 TDI
VS
Lynk & Co011.5 T3vsSeatTarraco2.0 TDI
BMW X2 (F39) 20i vs Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3 - car comparison - FastVsFaster