BMW X2 (F39)
Car comparison
BMW X2 (F39) 20d · Stage 3vsBMW X2 (F39) 20d · Stage 2vsBMW X2 (F39) 20d · Stage 1vsBMW X2 (F39) 20d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X2 (F39)
20d (Stage 2)
BMW X2 (F39)
20d (Stage 1)
BMW X2 (F39)
20d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X2 (F39) 20d (Stage 3) 295 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed261 km/h162 mph
- Most powerful295 hp220 kW
- Highest torque640 Nm472 lb-ft
- Lightest1,600 kg3,527 lb
- Best power-to-weight184 hp/t137 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,063 km660 mi
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 3)295 hp | BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 2)257 hp | BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 1)228 hp | BMWX2 (F39)20d190 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 295hp220kW+105 hp | 257hp191kW+67 hp | 228hp170kW+38 hp | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 640Nm472lb-ft+240 Nm | 560Nm413lb-ft+160 Nm | 500Nm369lb-ft+100 Nm | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,600kg3,527lb | 1,600kg3,527lb | 1,600kg3,527lb | 1,600kg3,527lb |
| Gross weight | 2,190kg4,828lb | 2,190kg4,828lb | 2,190kg4,828lb | 2,190kg4,828lb |
| Top speed | 261 km/h 162 mph | 251 km/h 156 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.2s99% target: 258 km/h / 161 mph-11.0 s Calculated | 70.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph-5.6 s Calculated | 74.3s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph-1.8 s Calculated | 76.2s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s-1.9 s | 6.4s-1.3 s | 6.9s-0.8 s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.0s-16.8 s Calculated | 22.2s-13.6 s Calculated | 25.5s-10.2 s Calculated | 35.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s-1.7 s Calculated | 6.1s-1.2 s Calculated | 6.5s-0.8 s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s-1.7 s Calculated | 14.4s-1.2 s Calculated | 14.8s-0.7 s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 184hp/t137kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated | 160hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 143hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 400Nm/t268lb-ft/ton Calculated | 350Nm/t234lb-ft/ton Calculated | 313Nm/t209lb-ft/ton Calculated | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,063km660mi Calculated | 1,063km660mi Calculated | 1,063km660mi Calculated | 1,063km660mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,360mm172in | 4,360mm172in | 4,360mm172in | 4,360mm172in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,824mm72in | 1,824mm72in | 1,824mm72in |
| Height | 1,526mm60in | 1,526mm60in | 1,526mm60in | 1,526mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,670mm105in | 2,670mm105in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,563mm62in | 1,563mm62in | 1,563mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,562mm61in | 1,562mm61in | 1,562mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 182mm7in | 182mm7in | 182mm7in | 182mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 470L | 470L | 470L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,355L | 1,355L | 1,355L | 1,355L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 51L | 51L | 51L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X2 (F39) 20d (Stage 3) 295 hp: Power / Torque
- BMW X2 (F39) 20d (Stage 2) 257 hp: Power / Torque
- BMW X2 (F39) 20d (Stage 1) 228 hp: Power / Torque
- BMW X2 (F39) 20d 190 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 3)295 hp | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 2)257 hp | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 1)228 hp | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d190 hp | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 3)295 hp | BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 2)257 hp | BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 1)228 hp | BMWX2 (F39)20d190 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.1 s | 6.5 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.4 s | 6.9 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.0 s | 22.2 s | 25.5 s | 35.8 s |
| Top speed | 261 km/h 162 mph | 251 km/h 156 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.4 s | 6.6 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.5 s | 9.8 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 12.2 s | 12.5 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.4 s | 14.8 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 173 km/h 107 mph | 165 km/h 103 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 3)295 hp | 295 hp 220 kW |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 2)257 hp | 257 hp 191 kW |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 1)228 hp | 228 hp 170 kW |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d190 hp | 190 hp 142 kW |
BMW X2 (F39) 20d (Stage 3) 295 hp has 105 hp more than BMW X2 (F39) 20d 190 hp.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20d 190 hp and BMW X2 (F39) 20d (Stage 3) 295 hp: 105 hp (78 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 3)295 hp | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 2)257 hp | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 1)228 hp | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d190 hp | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 3)295 hp | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 2)257 hp | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 1)228 hp | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d190 hp | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 3)295 hp | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 2)257 hp | 251 km/h 156 mph |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 1)228 hp | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d190 hp | 221 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 3)295 hp | 5.9 s |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 2)257 hp | 6.4 s |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 1)228 hp | 6.9 s |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d190 hp | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20d (Stage 3) 295 hp and BMW X2 (F39) 20d 190 hp: 1.9 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are BMW X2 (F39) 20d (Stage 2) 257 hp and BMW X2 (F39) 20d (Stage 1) 228 hp, separated by only 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 3)295 hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 2)257 hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 1)228 hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d190 hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 3)295 hp | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 2)257 hp | 160 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 1)228 hp | 143 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d190 hp | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 3)295 hp | 1,063 km 660 mi |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 2)257 hp | 1,063 km 660 mi |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 1)228 hp | 1,063 km 660 mi |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d190 hp | 1,063 km 660 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 3)295 hp | 295 hp 220 kW | 5.9 s | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 2)257 hp | 257 hp 191 kW | 6.4 s | 251 km/h 156 mph |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 1)228 hp | 228 hp 170 kW | 6.9 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d190 hp | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.7 s | 221 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 3)295 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 2)257 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 1)228 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX2 (F39)20d190 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 3)295 hp |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 2)257 hp |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 1)228 hp |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX2 (F39)20d190 hp |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X2 (F39) 20d (Stage 3) 295 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 3)295 hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 2)257 hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 1)228 hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d190 hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 3)295 hp | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 2)257 hp | 160 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 1)228 hp | 143 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d190 hp | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 3)295 hp | BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 2)257 hp | BMWX2 (F39)20d (Stage 1)228 hp | BMWX2 (F39)20d190 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 295 hp 220 kW | 257 hp 191 kW | 228 hp 170 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.4 s | 6.9 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 261 km/h 162 mph | 251 km/h 156 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,063 km 660 mi | 1,063 km 660 mi | 1,063 km 660 mi | 1,063 km 660 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 160 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 143 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X2 (F39) 20d (Stage 3) 295 hp | BMW X2 (F39) 20d (Stage 2) 257 hp | BMW X2 (F39) 20d (Stage 1) 228 hp | BMW X2 (F39) 20d 190 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X2 (F39) 20d (Stage 3) 295 hp
- Has 38 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
BMW X2 (F39) 20d (Stage 2) 257 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























