AUDI Q5 II (FY)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDIvsBMW X2 (F39) 20d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X2 (F39)
20d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed223 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,121 km696 mi
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best practicality score86/100
BMW X2 (F39) 20d
- Lightest1,600 kg3,527 lb
- Best power-to-weight119 hp/t89 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score94/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | BMWX2 (F39)20d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | 1,600kg3,527lb |
| Gross weight | 2,430kg5,357lb | 2,190kg4,828lb |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.1s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 76.0s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.0s Calculated | 35.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,121km696mi Calculated | 1,063km660mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,663mm184in | 4,360mm172in |
| Width | 1,893mm75in | 1,824mm72in |
| Height | 1,659mm65in | 1,526mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,819mm111in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,616mm64in | 1,563mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | 1,562mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 182mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 470L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,355L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | 153g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI: Power / Torque
- BMW X2 (F39) 20d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 3,250-4,200 rpm | 1,500-3,250 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | BMWX2 (F39)20d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.0 s | 35.7 s |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 221 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 7.6 s |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI and BMW X2 (F39) 20d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20d and AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 1,121 km 696 mi |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 1,063 km 660 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.7 s | 221 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX2 (F39)20d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX2 (F39)20d |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X2 (F39) 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | BMWX2 (F39)20d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,121 km 696 mi | 1,063 km 660 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 153 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI | BMW X2 (F39) 20d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.15 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,523 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 58 km (36 mi) more estimated range
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
BMW X2 (F39) 20d
- Is 145 kg lighter
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























