Car comparison

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDIvsBMW X2 (F39) 20d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q5 II (FY)

40 TDI

190 hp1968 ccDieselAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2019-2020
VS

BMW X2 (F39)

20d

190 hp1995 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    223 km/h
    139 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    1,121 km
    696 mi
  • Largest trunk
    550 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best practicality score
    86/100

BMW X2 (F39) 20d

  • Lightest
    1,600 kg
    3,527 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    119 hp/t
    89 kW/t
    8.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDIBMWX2 (F39)20d
Power
190hp142kW
190hp142kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,745kg3,847lb
1,600kg3,527lb
Gross weight
2,430kg5,357lb
2,190kg4,828lb
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
221 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
85.1s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
76.0s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.6s
7.7s
0-200 km/h
37.0s
Calculated
35.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
7.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.5s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb
Calculated
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton
Calculated
250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,121km696mi
Calculated
1,063km660mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,663mm184in
4,360mm172in
Width
1,893mm75in
1,824mm72in
Height
1,659mm65in
1,526mm60in
Wheelbase
2,819mm111in
2,670mm105in
Front track
1,616mm64in
1,563mm62in
Rear track
1,609mm63in
1,562mm61in
Ground clearance-
182mm7in
Trunk volume
550L
470L
Max trunk volume-
1,355L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
65L
51L
CO2 emissions
153g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDIBMW X2 (F39) 20dPowerTorque
  • AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI: Power / Torque
  • BMW X2 (F39) 20d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI3,250-4,200 rpm1,500-3,250 rpm4,450 rpm
BMWX2 (F39)20d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDIBMWX2 (F39)20d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
7.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.6 s
7.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
37.0 s
35.7 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
221 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.5 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
190 hp
142 kW
BMWX2 (F39)20d
190 hp
142 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
BMWX2 (F39)20d
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
1,745 kg
3,847 lb
BMWX2 (F39)20d
1,600 kg
3,527 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
223 km/h
139 mph
BMWX2 (F39)20d
221 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI7.6 s
BMWX2 (F39)20d7.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI and BMW X2 (F39) 20d: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
BMWX2 (F39)20d
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20d and AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
BMWX2 (F39)20d
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
1,121 km
696 mi
BMWX2 (F39)20d
1,063 km
660 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
190 hp
142 kW
7.6 s
223 km/h
139 mph
BMWX2 (F39)20d
190 hp
142 kW
7.7 s
221 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,663 mm
183.6 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in
BMWX2 (F39)20d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,360 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,526 mm
60.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
BMWX2 (F39)20d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

BMW X2 (F39) 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
7.6 s
BMWX2 (F39)20d
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
7.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
BMWX2 (F39)20d
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDIBMWX2 (F39)20d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.6 s
7.7 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
221 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,745 kg
3,847 lb
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
Fuel consumption
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,663 mm
183.6 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,360 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,526 mm
60.1 in
Range score
1,121 km
696 mi
1,063 km
660 mi
CO2 score
153 g/km
-
Trunk score
550 L
19.4 cu ft
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDIBMW X2 (F39) 20d
Consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.15 LC100 km8.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.33 LC100 mi13.52 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used870 L230 US gal191 UK gal720 L190 US gal158 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,523 LC/year1,260 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI

  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 58 km (36 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 80 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

BMW X2 (F39) 20d

  • Is 145 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI
BMW X2 (F39) 20d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI vs BMW X2 (F39) 20d - car comparison - FastVsFaster