Car comparison

BMW X2 (F39) 18dvsCupra Formentor 1.5 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X2 (F39)

18d

150 hp1995 ccDieselAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2018-2023
VS

Cupra Formentor

1.5 TSI

150 hp1498 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2020-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X2 (F39) 18d

  • Fastest top speed
    206 km/h
    128 mph
  • Most powerful
    150 hp
    112 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    981 km
    609 mi
  • Largest trunk
    470 L
  • Best overall score
    55/100
  • Best performance score
    42/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Cupra Formentor 1.5 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.9 s
  • Lightest
    1,388 kg
    3,060 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    108 hp/t
    81 kW/t
    9.3 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX2 (F39)18dCupraFormentor1.5 TSI
Power
150hp112kW
150hp112kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
250Nm184lb-ft
Curb weight
1,580kg3,483lb
1,388kg3,060lb
Gross weight
2,160kg4,762lb
1,980kg4,365lb
Top speed
206 km/h
128 mph
203 km/h
126 mph
To 99% top speed
84.9s99% target: 204 km/h / 127 mph
Calculated
81.0s99% target: 201 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
9.2s
8.9s
0-200 km/h
62.7s
Calculated
73.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.7s
Calculated
8.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
16.7s
Calculated
16.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
95hp/t71kW/t43hp/1000 lb
Calculated
108hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
222Nm/t148lb-ft/ton
Calculated
180Nm/t121lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
981km609mi
Calculated
714km444mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,498cc91cu in
Length
4,360mm172in
4,450mm175in
Width
1,824mm72in
1,839mm72in
Height
1,526mm60in
1,528mm60in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,680mm106in
Front track
1,563mm62in
1,585mm62in
Rear track
1,562mm61in
1,559mm61in
Ground clearance
182mm7in
-
Trunk volume
470L
450L
Max trunk volume
1,355L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
50L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X2 (F39) 18dCupra Formentor 1.5 TSIPowerTorque
  • BMW X2 (F39) 18d: Power / Torque
  • Cupra Formentor 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX2 (F39)18d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
CupraFormentor1.5 TSI5,000-6,000 rpm1,500-3,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX2 (F39)18dCupraFormentor1.5 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.7 s
8.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
9.2 s
8.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
62.7 s
73.1 s
Top speed
206 km/h
128 mph
203 km/h
126 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.3 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.9 s
10.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
14.1 s
13.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.7 s
16.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
139 km/h
86 mph
139 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)18d
150 hp
112 kW
CupraFormentor1.5 TSI
150 hp
112 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)18d
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
CupraFormentor1.5 TSI
250 Nm
184 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)18d
1,580 kg
3,483 lb
CupraFormentor1.5 TSI
1,388 kg
3,060 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)18d
206 km/h
128 mph
CupraFormentor1.5 TSI
203 km/h
126 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)18d9.2 s
CupraFormentor1.5 TSI8.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Formentor 1.5 TSI and BMW X2 (F39) 18d: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)18d
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
CupraFormentor1.5 TSI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 18d and Cupra Formentor 1.5 TSI: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)18d
95 hp/t
71 kW/t
10.5 kg/hp
CupraFormentor1.5 TSI
108 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)18d
981 km
609 mi
CupraFormentor1.5 TSI
714 km
444 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX2 (F39)18d
150 hp
112 kW
9.2 s
206 km/h
128 mph
CupraFormentor1.5 TSI
150 hp
112 kW
8.9 s
203 km/h
126 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX2 (F39)18d
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h9.2 s
Top speed
206 km/h
128 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,360 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,526 mm
60.1 in
CupraFormentor1.5 TSI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
203 km/h
126 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,450 mm
175.2 in
Height
1,528 mm
60.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX2 (F39)18d
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h9.2 s
Top speed
206 km/h
128 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
CupraFormentor1.5 TSI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
203 km/h
126 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

BMW X2 (F39) 18d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX2 (F39)18d
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
9.2 s
CupraFormentor1.5 TSI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
8.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX2 (F39)18d
95 hp/t
71 kW/t
10.5 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
CupraFormentor1.5 TSI
108 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.3 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX2 (F39)18dCupraFormentor1.5 TSI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
Acceleration
9.2 s
8.9 s
Top speed
206 km/h
128 mph
203 km/h
126 mph
Lightness
1,580 kg
3,483 lb
1,388 kg
3,060 lb
Fuel consumption
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,360 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,526 mm
60.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,450 mm
175.2 in
Height
1,528 mm
60.2 in
Range score
981 km
609 mi
714 km
444 mi
Trunk score
470 L
16.6 cu ft
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
95 hp/t
71 kW/t
10.5 kg/hp
108 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X2 (F39) 18dCupra Formentor 1.5 TSI
Consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.10 LC100 km12.25 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.65 LC100 mi19.71 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used780 L206 US gal172 UK gal1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,365 LC/year1,838 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X2 (F39) 18d

  • Has 100 Nm more
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 266 km (166 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 20 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Cupra Formentor 1.5 TSI

  • Is 192 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X2 (F39) 18d
Cupra Formentor 1.5 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

BMW X2 (F39) 18d vs Cupra Formentor 1.5 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster