BMW X1 (U11)
Car comparison
BMW X1 (U11) 20ivsBMW X2 (U10) 20i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X2 (U10)
20i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X1 (U11) 20i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Fastest top speed216 km/h134 mph
- Most powerful156 hp116 kW
- Highest torque240 Nm177 lb-ft
- Lightest1,550 kg3,417 lb
- Best power-to-weight101 hp/t75 kW/t9.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score44/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score75/100
BMW X2 (U10) 20i
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range692 km430 mi
- Largest trunk515 L
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX1 (U11)20i | BMWX2 (U10)20i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 156hp116kW | 156hp116kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,550kg3,417lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Gross weight | 2,120kg4,674lb | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 94.3s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated | 92.7s99% target: 211 km/h / 131 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 47.2s Calculated | 50.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated | 99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 155Nm/t104lb-ft/ton Calculated | 153Nm/t102lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 682km424mi Calculated | 692km430mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,499cc91cu in | 1,499cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,500mm177in | 4,554mm179in |
| Width | 1,845mm73in | 1,845mm73in |
| Height | 1,642mm65in | 1,590mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,692mm106in | 2,692mm106in |
| Front track | 1,592mm63in | 1,674mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,593mm63in | 1,675mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 205mm8in | 207mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 515L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,545L | 1,400L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 45L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X1 (U11) 20i: Power / Torque
- BMW X2 (U10) 20i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (U11)20i | 4,700-6,500 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BMWX2 (U10)20i | 4,700-6,500 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX1 (U11)20i | BMWX2 (U10)20i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 47.2 s | 50.5 s |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (U11)20i | 156 hp 116 kW |
| BMWX2 (U10)20i | 156 hp 116 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (U11)20i | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| BMWX2 (U10)20i | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (U11)20i | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb |
| BMWX2 (U10)20i | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (U11)20i | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| BMWX2 (U10)20i | 213 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (U11)20i | 8.3 s |
| BMWX2 (U10)20i | 8.3 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (U11)20i | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| BMWX2 (U10)20i | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (U11)20i | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
| BMWX2 (U10)20i | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (U11)20i | 682 km 424 mi |
| BMWX2 (U10)20i | 692 km 430 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (U11)20i | 156 hp 116 kW | 8.3 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| BMWX2 (U10)20i | 156 hp 116 kW | 8.3 s | 213 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (U11)20i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX2 (U10)20i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (U11)20i |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX2 (U10)20i |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X1 (U11) 20i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (U11)20i | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| BMWX2 (U10)20i | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (U11)20i | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| BMWX2 (U10)20i | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX1 (U11)20i | BMWX2 (U10)20i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 156 hp 116 kW | 156 hp 116 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 682 km 424 mi | 692 km 430 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 515 L 18.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X1 (U11) 20i | BMW X2 (U10) 20i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X1 (U11) 20i
- Is 20 kg lighter
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
BMW X2 (U10) 20i
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 km (7 mi) more estimated range
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























