BMW X2 (U10)
Car comparison
BMW X2 (U10) 20ivsBMW X1 (U11) 20d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X1 (U11)
20d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X2 (U10) 20i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Fastest top speed213 km/h132 mph
- Most powerful156 hp116 kW
- Lightest1,570 kg3,461 lb
- Best power-to-weight99 hp/t74 kW/t10.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk515 L
- Best practicality score75/100
BMW X1 (U11) 20d
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range882 km548 mi
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score45/100
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX2 (U10)20i | BMWX1 (U11)20d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 156hp116kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,570kg3,461lb | 1,610kg3,549lb |
| Gross weight | 2,150kg4,740lb | 2,180kg4,806lb |
| Top speed | 213 km/h 132 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 92.7s99% target: 211 km/h / 131 mph Calculated | 95.2s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 50.5s Calculated | 57.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated | 93hp/t69kW/t42hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 153Nm/t102lb-ft/ton Calculated | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 692km430mi Calculated | 882km548mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,499cc91cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,554mm179in | 4,500mm177in |
| Width | 1,845mm73in | 1,845mm73in |
| Height | 1,590mm63in | 1,642mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,692mm106in | 2,692mm106in |
| Front track | 1,674mm66in | 1,592mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,675mm66in | 1,593mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 207mm8in | 205mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 515L | 500L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,400L | 1,545L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 45L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X2 (U10) 20i: Power / Torque
- BMW X1 (U11) 20d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (U10)20i | 4,700-6,500 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BMWX1 (U11)20d | 3,750-4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX2 (U10)20i | BMWX1 (U11)20d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 50.5 s | 57.2 s |
| Top speed | 213 km/h 132 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 141 km/h 88 mph | 139 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (U10)20i | 156 hp 116 kW |
| BMWX1 (U11)20d | 150 hp 112 kW |
BMW X2 (U10) 20i has 6 hp more than BMW X1 (U11) 20d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X1 (U11) 20d and BMW X2 (U10) 20i: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (U10)20i | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| BMWX1 (U11)20d | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (U10)20i | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
| BMWX1 (U11)20d | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (U10)20i | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| BMWX1 (U11)20d | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (U10)20i | 8.3 s |
| BMWX1 (U11)20d | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X2 (U10) 20i and BMW X1 (U11) 20d: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (U10)20i | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (U11)20d | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X1 (U11) 20d and BMW X2 (U10) 20i: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (U10)20i | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp |
| BMWX1 (U11)20d | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (U10)20i | 692 km 430 mi |
| BMWX1 (U11)20d | 882 km 548 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (U10)20i | 156 hp 116 kW | 8.3 s | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| BMWX1 (U11)20d | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.5 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (U10)20i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX1 (U11)20d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (U10)20i |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX1 (U11)20d |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X1 (U11) 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (U10)20i | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| BMWX1 (U11)20d | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (U10)20i | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (U11)20d | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX2 (U10)20i | BMWX1 (U11)20d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 156 hp 116 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 213 km/h 132 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 692 km 430 mi | 882 km 548 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 515 L 18.2 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X2 (U10) 20i | BMW X1 (U11) 20d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X2 (U10) 20i
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
BMW X1 (U11) 20d
- Has 120 Nm more
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 190 km (118 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























