Car comparison

BMW X1 (F48) 25dvsSubaru Forester IV · Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X1 (F48)

25d

231 hp1995 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2015-2018
VS

Subaru Forester IV · Facelift 2016

Sport 2.0 T

240 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X1 (F48) 25d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,575 kg
    3,472 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    137 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    981 km
    609 mi
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX1 (F48)25dSubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
Power
231hp172kW
240hp179kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,575kg3,472lb
1,624kg3,580lb
Gross weight
2,170kg4,784lb
2,110kg4,652lb
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
221 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
69.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
79.1s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.6s
7.5s
0-200 km/h
26.1s
Calculated
36.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
7.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
147hp/t109kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
286Nm/t191lb-ft/ton
Calculated
216Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
981km609mi
Calculated
706km439mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,439mm175in
4,595mm181in
Width
1,821mm72in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,598mm63in
1,735mm68in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,640mm104in
Front track
1,561mm61in
1,545mm61in
Rear track
1,562mm61in
1,555mm61in
Ground clearance
183mm7in
220mm9in
Trunk volume
505L
505L
Max trunk volume
1,550L
1,557L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
60L
CO2 emissions
137g/km
197g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X1 (F48) 25dSubaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 TPowerTorque
  • BMW X1 (F48) 25d: Power / Torque
  • Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX1 (F48)25d4,400 rpm1,500-3,000 rpm4,650 rpm
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T5,600 rpm2,400-3,600 rpm5,850 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX1 (F48)25dSubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
7.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.6 s
7.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.1 s
36.4 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
221 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
159 km/h
99 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25d
231 hp
172 kW
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
240 hp
179 kW

Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T has 9 hp more than BMW X1 (F48) 25d.

The biggest power difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 25d and Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T: 9 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25d
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25d
1,575 kg
3,472 lb
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
1,624 kg
3,580 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25d
235 km/h
146 mph
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
221 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25d6.6 s
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T7.5 s

Although Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T has more power, BMW X1 (F48) 25d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 25d and Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25d
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 25d and Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T: 3.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25d
147 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25d
981 km
609 mi
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
706 km
439 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX1 (F48)25d
231 hp
172 kW
6.6 s
235 km/h
146 mph
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
240 hp
179 kW
7.5 s
221 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX1 (F48)25d
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,439 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,598 mm
62.9 in
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,595 mm
180.9 in
Height
1,735 mm
68.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX1 (F48)25d
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK

BMW X1 (F48) 25d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX1 (F48)25d
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
6.6 s
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
7.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX1 (F48)25d
147 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX1 (F48)25dSubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
Power
231 hp
172 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.6 s
7.5 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
221 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,575 kg
3,472 lb
1,624 kg
3,580 lb
Fuel consumption
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,439 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,598 mm
62.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,595 mm
180.9 in
Height
1,735 mm
68.3 in
Range score
981 km
609 mi
706 km
439 mi
CO2 score
137 g/km
197 g/km
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
147 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X1 (F48) 25dSubaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T
Consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.10 LC100 km14.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.65 LC100 mi23.94 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used780 L206 US gal172 UK gal1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,365 LC/year2,231 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X1 (F48) 25d

  • Has 100 Nm more
  • Is 49 kg lighter
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 275 km (171 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 60 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T

  • Has 9 hp more
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X1 (F48) 25d
Subaru Forester IV Sport 2.0 T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

25d
28i
VS
BMWX1 (F48)25dvsBMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i
Sport 2.0 T
2.0
VS
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TvsSubaruForester IV2.0
25d
28i
VS
BMWX1 (F48)25dvsBMWX1 (E84)28i
Sport 2.0 T
2.5 Turbo
VS
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TvsSubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
25d
23i
VS
BMWX1 (F48)25dvsBMWX1 (U11)23i
Sport 2.0 T
2.5 XT
VS
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TvsSubaruForester III2.5 XT
25d
25d
VS
BMWX1 (F48)25dvsBMWX2 (F39)25d
Sport 2.0 T
2.5 i 16V Turbo
VS
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TvsSubaruForester II2.5 i 16V Turbo
25d
28i
VS
BMWX1 (F48)25dvsBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428i
Sport 2.0 T
2.0d
VS
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TvsJaguarF-Pace2.0d
25d
30d
VS
BMWX1 (F48)25dvsBMWX6 (F16)30d
Sport 2.0 T
2.0 BiTDI
VS
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
BMW X1 (F48) 25d vs Subaru Forester IV · Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T - car comparison - FastVsFaster