BMW X1 (F48)
Car comparison
BMW X1 (F48) 25dvsLexus NX I (AZ10) 200t
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLexus NX I (AZ10)
200t
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X1 (F48) 25d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,575 kg3,472 lb
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t109 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions137 g/km
- Best estimated range981 km609 mi
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score93/100
Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t
- Most powerful238 hp177 kW
- Largest trunk555 L
- Best practicality score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX1 (F48)25d | LexusNX I (AZ10)200t |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 238hp177kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,575kg3,472lb | 1,685kg3,715lb |
| Gross weight | 2,170kg4,784lb | 2,295kg5,060lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 69.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 71.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.1s Calculated | 44.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t109kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 286Nm/t191lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 981km609mi Calculated | 779km484mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,439mm175in | 4,630mm182in |
| Width | 1,821mm72in | 1,845mm73in |
| Height | 1,598mm63in | 1,645mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | 1,561mm61in | 1,580mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,580mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 183mm7in | 185mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 555L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,550L | 1,600L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 137g/km | 178g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X1 (F48) 25d: Power / Torque
- Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 4,800 rpm | 1,650 rpm | 5,700 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX1 (F48)25d | LexusNX I (AZ10)200t |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.1 s | 44.1 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d | 231 hp 172 kW |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 238 hp 177 kW |
Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t has 7 hp more than BMW X1 (F48) 25d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 25d and Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d | 6.6 s |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 7.3 s |
Although Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t has more power, BMW X1 (F48) 25d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 25d and Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 25d and Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d | 981 km 609 mi |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 779 km 484 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.6 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 238 hp 177 kW | 7.3 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X1 (F48) 25d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX1 (F48)25d | LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 238 hp 177 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 981 km 609 mi | 779 km 484 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 137 g/km | 178 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 555 L 19.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X1 (F48) 25d | Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.10 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,365 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X1 (F48) 25d
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 110 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 202 km (125 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 41 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























