BMW X1 (F48)
Car comparison
BMW X1 (F48) 20dvsMini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Countryman (F60)
Cooper SD 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X1 (F48) 20d
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,500 kg3,307 lb
- Best power-to-weight127 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions123 g/km
- Best estimated range1,085 km674 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX1 (F48)20d | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,500kg3,307lb | 1,535kg3,384lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,130kg4,696lb |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.3s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 76.1s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.9s Calculated | 37.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 267Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated | 261Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,085km674mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,439mm175in | 4,299mm169in |
| Width | 1,821mm72in | 1,822mm72in |
| Height | 1,598mm63in | 1,557mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,561mm61in | 1,563mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,565mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 183mm7in | 165mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,550L | 1,390L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | 123g/km | 133g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X1 (F48) 20d: Power / Torque
- Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX1 (F48)20d | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.9 s | 37.5 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 92 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 190 hp 142 kW |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 7.8 s |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and BMW X1 (F48) 20d: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 1,085 km 674 mi |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,000 km 621 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.8 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X1 (F48) 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX1 (F48)20d | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,085 km 674 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 123 g/km | 133 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X1 (F48) 20d | Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X1 (F48) 20d
- Is 35 kg lighter
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 85 km (53 mi) more estimated range
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
- Emits 10 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























